lol Yup, that sure could happen. I've been playing along and whammo my computer went down--have to start over unless I could remember my winnings/losings and # of hands. But these guys wouldn't do it on purpose, cept maybe Sage or jj or or Kasi, maybe...naw, even they wouldn't do it.SleightOfHand said:
just if you ever figure this one out:k_c said:....
Your welcome. I do the best I can to stick to basics and keep from falling overboard into the
Take the North Flank! The Germans are on their Shermans. Notify Command post and tell them that the 5th infantry division unit, will be implementing, back-up plan, "Operation Black Fire".SleightOfHand said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5qEN44XMkM&NR=1sagefr0g said:absolutely, jump in there, we need more hands. :cool2:
just got lucky. lmao
I thought it was either a typo or maybe was in dollars rather than units. I think we agree on what is expected based on spread etc.k_c said:
I agree - it's just that I have the feeling some of those win-rate graphs are maybe generated by CVBJ rather than CVCX and I think CVBJ is not consistent with CVCX in that CVBJ counts splits as 2 hands rather than 1 round but CVCX would count it as 1 round. I could be wrong on both or either lol. I have no idea whether individual reported results are "hands" or "rounds".k_c said:
I've never tried to figure out an avg TC count. I guess you're implying it'd be nice if it's 0? And maybe also implying in your case a flat-betting BS player would also be below EV as "luck" would have it? The few hands I've played in these threads, I guess just out of habit and because it's one of the few things I can do, I always know where I stand had I flat-betted $1 every hand. Not that I know what to make of the BS results compared to CC results lol. Do you perchance know how many units up or down a flat-betting BS would be in what you're doing? Not that it would matter anyway lol but I always liked to compare if my "voodoo", on the internet in a constant -EV game, or my "AP" stuff here, sad as it is, was exceding a flat-betting BS player or not.k_c said:
Well the avg bet might be 1.1 with doubling and splitting but I don't know about the SD. I doubt if it's worth it but I'm not you. Sometimes I just work backwards assuming like the 41000 are "hands", not "rounds", and subtract an expected number of split hands, usually a wild-ass guess anyway depending on number of re-splits allowed etc, and see what happens.k_c said:
Ahhh, the welcoming black void of voodoo, always beckoning me from afar like the Sirens calling. Yet so feared by the Warriors here, despite it's 100% ROR and certain death in the abyss, I've been banned from employing it here, more specifically being allowed to bet with any amount I choose anytime I want with the same $10K starting roll as if it were just another CC system like Hi-Lo, KO etc but with a bigger spread and no indexes and no CC lol.k_c said:Your welcome. I do the best I can to stick to basics and keep from falling overboard into the
Sure it's been considered lol. More likely is JJ and Wise One have been skimming their wins betting with bigger spreads than team rules allowSleightOfHand said:
Yeah the flat betting BS player is +51 units after 1000 shoes/13018 rounds. Average pre-deal EV=-.6547% as compared to a full shoe EV=-.5416%. The average Hi-Lo TC=-.23 says that on balance more high cards than low were dealt and that would benefit the flat bettor while at the same time bring down the average pre-deal EV. Blackjack's a fickle game. You want the count to rise so you can raise the bet but if the count goes up you have an increased chance of losing. If instead the count keeps going down you have an increased chance of winning. :devil: So far for both WWI and WWII average TC has for the most part tended to be negative. I wonder if this is a trend or just one of those things.Kasi said:
Well at an average of 13 rounds per shuffle that would be 1806685914005299069209727041891894768730376211337394077930718423197597779083713462650000000 :cat:sagefr0g said:just if you ever figure this one out:
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showpost.php?p=94931&postcount=51
inquiring minds would like to know.
how many rounds would this many shuffles
13897583953886915916997900322245344374849047779518 415
9840824494092122906083362574050000000
represent anyway? ball park answer would be ok. lmao
No,no, not at all. If you check my Stat graph, you'll be able to tell, Ive played every hand and all Maxbets are displayed.Kasi said:
Well, your a better man than I am. I guess I started getting burnt after 23,000 hands and attempted to snatch a few lucky 50$ bets. Bad mistake....bad mistakek_c said:Your welcome. I do the best I can to stick to basics and keep from falling overboard into the
Lol:laugh: Theres just something about posting my results, that I take alot of pride in. Posting False-positive results would kill the pride in that for me. I wouldnt play if it meant trying to impress others with my results.aslan said:lol Yup, that sure could happen. I've been playing along and whammo my computer went down--have to start over unless I could remember my winnings/losings and # of hands. But these guys wouldn't do it on purpose, cept maybe Sage or jj or or Kasi, maybe...naw, even they wouldn't do it.
jj's a dang gone pirate captn. i'm pure as the 'drivin snow' :angel:Kasi said:
i never once bet above the 1:10 spread. $50 is been my max. i'm innocent i tell ya. :cool2:
yap, yap, yap
my life is an open book for all to see.
I think Kasi, was just agreeing with sleight-of-hand. I understand how frusterated he might feel dealing with idiots like me. Technicality is his specialty, and it probably just drives him nuts to see a bunch of wild'o'hawgs trying to accomplish something without cause. Guess why canceler hasnt posted?aslan said:
Because he read another book on submarines.
Hows that hi-opt working out for ya? It appears your betting is pretty accurate, while your having a rough time with those min bets. Anyway, keep those hands comingSleightOfHand said:
big number for sure lol.k_c said:
