The pen hurt and poor PE hurt. Do you just use HILO or do you add a side count or 2?Sage said:I was in an area that had 4 casinos in NM this weekend. They all had DD with a pen of 50% plus/minus. Played hi-lo in 3 shops and lost in all of them. Wondering if the pen was part of the problem??
3 sessions is not enough to decide anything on. HILO is at best adequate for DD. They tend to not tolerate large spreads so BC is less important to begin with. You get much larger range of TCs along with a higher frequency of extreme TCs. Gain as an index is exceeded is proportional to the correlation to your count's tags to the EOR values for the hand match up. That is why PE is so important in SD and DD. PE is sort of an average of this correlation overall for hand match ups. Hilo has many strong index plays were you realize this gain but it also has many very weak ones were your gain is very small as the index is exceeded by a lot. Side counts can help some of these match ups and strengthen others.Sage said:Just use Hi-Lo. Saw a post here the other day that HI-Lo was fine for DD.
But that is the count I use regardless.
It seemed that most of the time the TC was less than 1
x2FLASH1296 said:As the tables become crowded pen is less valuable.
With the 60% pen, what is the max number of players / hands being played before you leave?
If the pen is 75% how many hands/players until you leave?
As the tables become crowded penetration is a MORE crucial variable.
With 60% pen you can expect to see 5 rounds with 3 others (4 & dealer)
With 75% pen you can expect to see 6 rounds with 3 others (4 & dealer)
I do not suggest playing with more than that. Two is bad enough.
Normally, one should avoid playing even with two others where possible.
I cite three "others" here as a rule of thumb re: maximum crowding;
and it only holds if the Rules are (at least) good.
It is best to try to play when the tables are the least crowded.
That is a priority in DD games.
A Level Two (or better) count should be employed in a DD game
irrespective of the rules, level of penetration, etc.