10,2 vs 4

tribute

Well-Known Member
In his book, Fred Renzey advises a basic strategy variation of hitting 10,2 vs dealer's 4 up, instead of standing. I would like to know the EV for each strategy. ( I think this is a close call, anyway.)
 

Renzey

Well-Known Member
10/2 vs 4

With 6 decks and the typical Stand soft 17, it's;
Hit = -.210
Std = -.211

With 1 deck and the typical Hit soft 17, it's;
Hit = -.195
Std = -.208
 

tribute

Well-Known Member
Wow, I didn't know it was that close! Thanks, Fred. I sure get a lot of grief from dealers when I hit that 12 !
 

rogue1

Well-Known Member
all I can say

All I can say is this: I read it in Blackjack Bluebook II and I now hit 10-2 vs 4,it usually works out well for me.
 

FGK42

Member
shadroch said:
And you'll bust more,as well. Standing on 12 ,you'll never bust or push.
I don't play to play. Why ever hit. Just hit until 11 then stand? The no bust strategy ?

I play to WIN :devil:
 

EasyRhino

Well-Known Member
Based on this table at the Wiz's site, if you have a 6D, H17 game, that rule of thumb is no longer true, and standing is still best.

My guess is that multidecks reduce the effect of card removal, and H17 does as well, so combined, they overwhelm the difference?
 

shadroch

Well-Known Member
FGK42 said:
I don't play to play. Why ever hit. Just hit until 11 then stand? The no bust strategy ?

I play to WIN :devil:
Playing to win?
Thats an interesting concept.
My tongue in cheek remark is a retort to ZGs post that by hitting your 12,you'll get more pushes,as if you can push by standing on 12.
 
Top