7 hands 14 vs 4

KOLAN

Well-Known Member
what you gona do?
7 hands 14,14,14,14,14,14,14 vs 4
all simulation say stand
i hink 3 hands need hit .
 
what you gona do?
7 hands 14,14,14,14,14,14,14 vs 4
all simulation say stand
i hink 3 hands need hit .

uɐןoʞ ʞɔɐq ǝɯoןǝʍ :)

I take it that your playing 6d-8d.

Sounds like the typical myth , "somebody's got to take a hit or we're all gonna lose".

If it's top of the shoe play BS, stand, otherwise follow your indices, I use H < -5.

BJC
 
Last edited:
14 vs 4 is an underdog

When you have a 14 vs 4 you will most likely lose the hand but basuc strategy tells us to stay because we will lose less money staying compared to hitting.
When you say you feel that you should hit three of those hands, I get the feeling that you know that by hitting 14 3 of 7 times you are likely to make a hand. Your problem though is you do not know which 3 hands to hit since you know neither the dealer's hole card or your hit card.
 
Am I missing something here.

Depends what cards comprise your so called 14s. Stand on 77, but Hit 10,4.

He is playing 14 vs 4
Why would he be standing on 7,7 and not spliting and why would he be hitting his 10,4?

ihate17
 
Depends what cards comprise your so called 14s. Stand on 77, but Hit 10,4.

JJ

How'd ya get that?

1st pic:
Comp-Dep sim using RPC RA 6d DAS, LS

2nd pic
Comp-Dep sim using Zen RA 6d

BJC
 

Attachments

  • 14vs.jpg
    14vs.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 328
  • 14vszen.jpg
    14vszen.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 342
When you have a 14 vs 4 you will most likely lose the hand but basuc strategy tells us to stay because we will lose less money staying compared to hitting.
When you say you feel that you should hit three of those hands, I get the feeling that you know that by hitting 14 3 of 7 times you are likely to make a hand. Your problem though is you do not know which 3 hands to hit since you know neither the dealer's hole card or your hit card.

samples 100 hands in 1 table all have 14 dealer 4
if you stand , dealer 17-21
you lost all 100 hands
bet if you hit definetly you lost less
(When you have a 14 vs 4 you will most likely lose the hand but basuc strategy tells us to stay because we will lose less money staying compared to hitting.)
 
?

samples 100 hands in 1 table all have 14 dealer 4
if you stand , dealer 17-21
you lost all 100 hands
bet if you hit definetly you lost less
(When you have a 14 vs 4 you will most likely lose the hand but basuc strategy tells us to stay because we will lose less money staying compared to hitting.)


Dealer showing a 4 and getting a 17-21 on 100 straight hands??????????
Has to be virtually impossible.
 
Dealer showing a 4 and getting a 17-21 on 100 straight hands??????????
Has to be virtually impossible.

this game rols is 100 deck game 100 hands avelible
players play 100 hands vs dealer
question.who can explayn whay i need to stand all 100 hands?
 
Think I am getting it but what is the answer

Here is my guess:
Kolan has a giant table with a giant shoe of 100 decks.
There are 100 players who all have 14 and the dealer has a 4 showing.

If everyone stays then all will lose if the dealer makes a hand.
If everyone stays then all will win if the dealer busts.
The players will win all or lose all but over a period land up losing since the dealer will make a hand more often than not.

Though not an AP situation, I think Kolan wants someone to give him figures on why all should still stay in this situation or should some hit?????


It is not that different than on a more realistic scale where the dealer is showing a 4 on top and every player has a stiff and stays. Actually, I think it is no different except here the players have 100 hands instead of 4 or 5.

ihate17
 
Video BJ?

Sounds like one of those 100 hand VP machines... designed for BJ, but you can play groups of hands differently. Do they make a game like that??

BJC
 
Last edited:
Back
Top