lol does that include the fuzzy count.21forme said:I was reading some of the mail on Arnold Snyder's board and came across this in one of his posts:
It's more important that you keep counting easy than that you attempt to extract every last tenth of a percent of potential value.
A very important point, IMO.
Of course it doesn't include the fuzzy count trying as you do to extract every ounce from it.sagefr0g said:lol does that include the fuzzy count.![]()
don't worry i know it doesn't. but hey it's the principle of the thing. lol
Fuzzy Wuzzy wasnt very Fuzzy, was he?:joker:Kasi said:Of course it doesn't include the fuzzy count trying as you do to extract every ounce from it.
You have to go to the "fuzzier" count to keep it easy :grin:
it's pretty fuzzy. lolKasi said:Of course it doesn't include the fuzzy count trying as you do to extract every ounce from it.
You have to go to the "fuzzier" count to keep it easy :grin:
hey jack,jackson guess what with uhmm errhh all that there side count second degree microscope on it stuff you do fougetaabout it. :whip:jack said:Fuzzy Wuzzy wasnt very Fuzzy, was he?:joker:
Ha! I have!....lesson learnedsagefr0g said:hey jack,jackson guess what with uhmm errhh all that there side count second degree microscope on it stuff you do fougetaabout it. :whip:
No need to explain - I've been using a blinking red bulb on my nose like that for years - works great :grin:jack said:Im currently working on Memorizing every card in multiple-decks by using a light-bulb and morris code. Ill explain later![]()