Your 25 cents figure is incorrect. If one assumes the house advantage to be a half-percent at all times, then one would lose 2.5 cents per hand on the primary wager.BrianCP said:At the local store, the O/U 13 side bet pays even money and the wager cannot exceed the original wager on your hand. Flat betting 5 dollars a hand and playing basic strategy, would being able to wager 5 dollars on the O/U 13 when it is in your favor be enough to eliminate the house edge at a 6 deck game? I know for each hand played, you would expect to lose 25 cents a hand. On average, what would be your EV on a five dollar even money O/U 13 bet when you only bet when you had an advantage, and would the dollar value per hand be enough to offset the negative dollar value per every normal hand?
Something tells me that the 6 deck makes it unlikely, but I want to be sure here. I don't like to miss opportunities for profit!
Yeah that sounds very exploitable, but could also be a bigtime counters trap.Southpaw said:Your 25 cents figure is incorrect. If one assumes the house advantage to be a half-percent at all times, then one would lose 2.5 cents per hand on the primary wager.
I know that there are specialized counts that are intended only for the O/U 13 bet. When using these, I hear it is highly profitable.
What I don't know is how well a normal count can be applied to the side-bet. I'd think pretty well, but I am not entirely certain.
Spaw
Its really only a good exploitable bte with a special count against 1D with 1-4 spread >>BrianCP said:At the local store, the O/U 13 side bet pays even money and the wager cannot exceed the original wager on your hand. Flat betting 5 dollars a hand and playing basic strategy, would being able to wager 5 dollars on the O/U 13 when it is in your favor be enough to eliminate the house edge at a 6 deck game? I know for each hand played, you would expect to lose 25 cents a hand. On average, what would be your EV on a five dollar even money O/U 13 bet when you only bet when you had an advantage, and would the dollar value per hand be enough to offset the negative dollar value per every normal hand?
Something tells me that the 6 deck makes it unlikely, but I want to be sure here. I don't like to miss opportunities for profit!
But you don't have to bet every hand. What if you only made the side bet in extremely high or extremely negative counts?zengrifter said:Its really only a good exploitable be with a specil count against 1D with 1-4 spread >>
Here - THE OVER/UNDER REPORT
Yes.Cardcounter said:What happens if you hit 13 exactly do you lose?
Of course it does, sucker :laugh:alwayssplitaces said:Over/under is for the initial 2 cards. Ace-2 counts as 13.
But.....But...aces are always counted as one! Before I was informed that there aren't any US casinos that offer a good O/U 13 game/bet, I was running some trials using the crush count from Professional Blackjack (looks like I'm giving that up, oh well). Count was -5 or lower, so under 13 bet twice in that shoe. Both times my first card was a 10, causing me to panic. The ten both times was followed by an ace. Win the under bet and 3:2 on my natural, if only it was really money!alwayssplitaces said:Over/under is for the initial 2 cards. Ace-2 counts as 13.