What are the troops doing overseas? Shouldn't they stay home in the first place? Which god will bless those they kill on a regular basis?aslan said:God bless our troops overseas who can't be home for Christmas.
My wish is the same as yours, but I have long recognized that peace is not achieved by unilaterally refraining from war. The peace that I seek is beyond the peace that comes from the absence of war. The peace I seek is a peace that cannot abide the killing of my fellow countrymen, my family, or my friends. May God save us all from evil and treacherous men, and may I assist in the process to the best of my ability to do so. That is why the Christmas Scriptures read "Glory to God, and on earth peace toward men of good will." (Luke 2:14) So then, even in the conflict of war, men can have inner peace, by knowing that they please God, even in the ugly necessity of defending precious human life.psyduck said:What are the troops doing overseas? Shouldn't they stay home in the first place? Which god will bless those they kill on a regular basis?
My wish has always been peace on earth!
We could adopt the "just guard the borders" security model and bring the troops home, but the world would be a much more dangerous place and the changes needed to successfully implement that model aren't very palatable.psyduck said:What are the troops doing overseas? Shouldn't they stay home in the first place? Which god will bless those they kill on a regular basis?
My wish has always been peace on earth!
StandardDeviant said:We could adopt the "just guard the borders" security model and bring the troops home, but the world would be a much more dangerous place and the changes needed to successfully implement that model aren't very palatable.
Interesting. You're not representing the current situation along the Pakistani border accurately. Can you say "drones" and "backlash?" And the logic you forward about the Pakistani government protecting our enemy (which isn't quite the case) and thereby declaring war on us, you dismiss where the Taliban is concerned. But you are right on one front: the original mission in Afghanistan has been eclipsed by the prospect of Taliban and Al Qaeda types gaining access to the Pakistani nukes. This isn't Britain leaving India or the French leaving Senegal. Not interested in continuing this thread in this section, just questioning a few details.aslan said:But I do agree that we may have lost sight of our original mission, that of defeating the perpetrators and bringing them to justice. They are in Pakistan and we are in Afghanistan. We are going after their aiders and abettors instead of them themselves on the theory that they will be welcomed back. If we can't pursue them where they are, haven't we already conceded defeat?
I say, go after the perpetrators of 911, not the Taliban. If for some reason we cannot pursue them into Pakistan (you'll have to explain that one to me), then we can wait them out. It's no different than any other criminal we pursue onto foreign soil. If the government of Pakistan wants to protect them, then are they not declaring war on us? That's one to think long and hard about.
Do you think total pacifism would be an option? If so, we need to talk about bridges and other things I'm selling.psyduck said:What are the troops doing overseas? Shouldn't they stay home in the first place? Which god will bless those they kill on a regular basis?
My wish has always been peace on earth!
We should all follow your example,,,,"Make Love Not War".:gaga:Billy C1 said:Do you think total pacifism would be an option? If so, we need to talk about bridges and other things I'm selling.
Billy C1
I'd be all for that, my friend!creeping panther said:We should all follow your example,,,,"Make Love Not War".:gaga:
CP
Playing for the Lord?Automatic Monkey said:I'll be working in about 6 hours. Romans 14:5-6
daddybo said:Peace
....
Generally the time of calm usually attained when all sides are reloading. Also the time when all sides are in the planning stages for war.