Book Review: "Playing Blackjack to Win"

FLASH1296

Well-Known Member
Copyright 1957, 2008 This is the NEW (Cardoza Edition) By Baldwin, Cantey, Maisel, and McDermott

The authors were recently inducted into the BJ Hall of Fame. For the last half century they have been referred to as "The Four Horseman of Aberdeen"

It is the complete original book with three added photos of the authors and a few pages by Arnold Snyder and Edwin Thorpe doing no more than lauding the authors.

Footnote: The original text had no photos of the authors because the publisher wouldn't print it that way as one of the author's was of Afro-American extraction.

This was the first book ever published with a fairly good Basic Strategy and was the precursor to Dr. Thorpe's "Beat the Dealer"

There were just 5,000 copies of the original book published. Why it was never re-printed is not given.

About 125 pages of text in a small softcover book; the list price of $15 USA and $17.50 CAN is hard to justify.

I had pre-ordered a copy long ago, as I own virtually every BJ book extant.

This book does a terrible disservice to the gambling public for several reasons.

Naturally, it contains NO references to any game other than the Single Deck S17 DAS game that is long extinct.

It incorrectly computes the Basic Strategist's e.v. as -.62, although against their flawed B.S. it may be correct or nearly so.

The Basic Strategy that comprises the bulk of this book is WRONG in spots, especially with bizarre advice e.g. DOUBLE DOWN on Hard 12 vs dealer's 5, and Soft 18 vs. 4, Hit A4 vs. dealer's 4, NO splitting of 4's (all of the foregoing with DAS) To make matters worse this book presents a "Simplified Basic Strategy" that is VERY poor, to understate the case, as it instructs one to Double Down on all Elevens and Tens and with no other total or soft hand; and to Split Aces and Eights ONLY and to stand on 12 vs. dealer's deuce and trey !

Note: pp. 59 says do NOT double down on a 12, but on pp. 60 it clearly directs that play via a chart and accompanying text.

it gives EXTREMELY POOR advice on card counting by instructing you to adjust your basic strategy plays in accordance with the last three cards that were exposed just prior to one's play. This is standard ploppy play (that Asian players are particulary prone to), as they stand on their 14 vs. a dealer's Face Card after scanning the table and finding an 'apparent' deficit of Face Cards. We have all seen this thousands of times. Ditto with Insurance decisions.

Some of us here would have willingly dashed off a chapter to update the Basic Strategy and discuss multi-deck shoes, rule variations, and an introduction to basic Card Counting.
 
Last edited:

bj bob

Well-Known Member
Rebuttal

FLASH1296 said:
Copyright 1957, 2008 This is the NEW (Cardoza Edition) By Baldwin, Cantey, Maisel, and McDermott

Footnote: The original text had no photos of the authors because the publisher wouldn't print it that way as one of the author's was of Afro-American extraction.

This was par for the course in 1957. It was just as offensive to portray Blacks in the media then as it is offensive to many to exclude them in today's culture. P.C. swings both ways, depending on the times.
This book does a terrible disservice to the gambling public for several reasons.

It contains NO references to any game other than the Single Deck S17 DAS game that is long extinct.
Again, this book was published in 1957 SD, S17 was virtually the only game to be played at the time. How can you devise a BS for a game that didn't exist yet?

It incorrectly computes the Basic Strategist's e.v. as -.62, although against their flawed B.S. it may be correct or nearly so.
Looking at the time frame of their work which was started during and shortly after the war, and with the computation devices available to them at the time viz. pencil, paper, slide rules and adding machines; it's a miracle that they came so close to perfection. Even Thorpe had the use of an IBM 704.


The Basic Strategy that comprises the bulk of this book is WRONG in spots, especially with bizarre advice e.g. DOUBLE DOWN on Hard 12 vs dealer's 5, and Soft 18 vs. 4, Hit A4 vs. dealer's 4, NO splitting of 4's (all of the foregoing with DAS) To make matters worse this book presents a "Simplified Basic Strategy" that is VERY poor, to understate the case, as it instructs one to Double Down on all Elevens and Tens and with no other total or soft hand; and to Split Aces and Eights ONLY.

Note: pp. 59 says do NOT double down on a 12, but on pp. 60 it clearly directs that play via a chart and accompanying text.

it gives EXTREMELY POOR advice on card counting by instructing you to adjust your basic strategy plays in accordance with the last three cards that were exposed just prior to one's play. This is standard ploppy play (that Asian players are particulary prone to), as they stand on their 14 vs. a dealer's Face Card after scanning the table and finding an 'apparent' deficit of Face Cards. We have all seen this thousands of times. Ditto with Insurance decisions.
Again, this was the first serious work done on this subject and it boggles my mind that these guys could even grasp the concept that the game could be beaten. They took a 5% HA and whittled it down by a factor of 8. They laid the foundation of a playing revolution, the results of which are evident to date in every BJ pit in the world.
Most of us here at Green Chip would have willingly dashed off a chapter to update the Basic Strategy and discuss multi-deck shoes, rule variations, and an introduction to basic Card Counting.
And again, these guys were the Wright Bros. of the Blackjack world. Just as we look at their original "plane" flown at Kitty Hawk and smile, it was their original effort that converted theory into a workable nuts and bolts craft that the rest of the world could modify and improve upon.
 

FLASH1296

Well-Known Member
You have missed the point



Obviously they were pioneers. That is the reason that they are now in the B J Hall of Fame.

I tried to make the point that the book is not only out-of-date, it is misleading.

The book has just been re-released, as in yesterday, as in "real-time."

There is simply NO rational excuse for not adding a few pages to forewarn the inexperienced and unknowledgeable that the game that they are reading about no longer exists ANYWHERE on the planet; and that the proffered Basic Strategy is worse than incomplete, it is simply wrong.

As such this book could cost the unwary purchaser money, far beyond the cost of purchase.
 

EasyRhino

Well-Known Member
Of course it's out of date, it's the dead sea scrolls of blackjack

Although I agree, it sounds like a couple pages of the foreward could have been useful as a disclaimer.
 

jaredmt

Well-Known Member
thanks for the warning. thats odd that they didnt mention that it is obsolete. maybe they just wanted some $$ lol
 
Top