We all know that the most likely value of the dealers hole card is a ten, but we also know that more than two thirds of the time, the card will not be a ten.
Two truths, but can either or both be used to our advantage?
Avery Cardoza suggests that we think of the dealers hole card as gravitating towars a ten. What he means is that the hand will have a tendency to increase in value by ten points.
An example he uses is a dealer up card of 9.
According to him, the dealer will make a hand of 19 about 36% of the time and have a 19 or better 52% of the time.
Any thoughts on this line of thinking?
Two truths, but can either or both be used to our advantage?
Avery Cardoza suggests that we think of the dealers hole card as gravitating towars a ten. What he means is that the hand will have a tendency to increase in value by ten points.
An example he uses is a dealer up card of 9.
According to him, the dealer will make a hand of 19 about 36% of the time and have a 19 or better 52% of the time.
Any thoughts on this line of thinking?