I almost let the "logic" of a ploppy affect my decisions yesterday (probably because I was sick as a dog and not able to use 100% judgment). The ploppy explained to the person next to him that it makes sense to stand when you have a hard-15 vs a dealer Ace. The reason being that once the dealer has checked for blackjack (and doesn't have it), the only cards that could be you would be a 6, 7, 8, or 9. So there are 4 cards which could beat you and 5 cards which wouldn't beat you (since he doesn't have a 10). So he'll take his chances with a 5:4 advantage rather than risk busting. This logic sounded reasonable to me in my weakened state. After further review, I realized that the logic was quite flawed.
Can anyone else explain the flaw in his "logic"? I'm curious what people think.
Can anyone else explain the flaw in his "logic"? I'm curious what people think.