I was reading the Double-down Index section at GameMaster Online, Lesson 15 http://www.gamemasteronline.com/Archive/BlackjackSchool/GameMasterClassics15.shtml (Archive copy). Some weird advice is given. It says we should double on:
But what about situation #3 and #4? Is my edge with a hard 9 or hard 10 against a dealer 3 or dealer 9 that great that I should double my bet even though I'm more likely to receive a low card than a high one? I just don't get it. Whose side are you on, GameMaster?
At negative 2 True Count I think it's time to look for excuses to wong out, instead of increasing the bet. In fact, as far as doubling-down is concerned, my policy is to not do it even if the count is only slightly negative.
This 24 lesson tutorial is very useful for the most part, despite little bits of wisdom that I find hard to swallow. If you downloaded the demo of QFIT's Casino Verite Blackjack V4, this tutorial is already on your hard drive.
- A-2 vs. 6 when True Count is -2
- A-3 vs. 5 when True Count is -2
- 9 vs. 3 when True Count is -1
- 10 vs. 9 when True Count is -2
But what about situation #3 and #4? Is my edge with a hard 9 or hard 10 against a dealer 3 or dealer 9 that great that I should double my bet even though I'm more likely to receive a low card than a high one? I just don't get it. Whose side are you on, GameMaster?
At negative 2 True Count I think it's time to look for excuses to wong out, instead of increasing the bet. In fact, as far as doubling-down is concerned, my policy is to not do it even if the count is only slightly negative.
This 24 lesson tutorial is very useful for the most part, despite little bits of wisdom that I find hard to swallow. If you downloaded the demo of QFIT's Casino Verite Blackjack V4, this tutorial is already on your hard drive.