Hi-Opt II question

The Mayor

Well-Known Member
For insurance, it varies by the number of decks -- so make sure you are matching the numbers for the same game.

As for being off by 1 -- it absolutely DOES NOT MATTER who is right and who is wrong. Choose a set of hi-opt II's from any source and learn them for the game you want to play most often.
 

Rob McGarvey

Well-Known Member
My numbers were created by SBA v5.0. I'm not sure how Humble got his. They were probably spun out by Einstein on a pocket calculator. I trust SBA so I used those #'s. 2001 publishers should use 2001 calcs. Mayor is right. BE tops out at 70%. Each index is also a composite of cards played, so even if you use the SBA #'s you are ball parking your play departures. PE tops out at 100%. Getting your $$ on the felt at the right time is the most important thing about counting.

What is most important is the game you play and the penetration.
 

Sonny

Well-Known Member
> BE tops out at 70%. Each index is also a composite of cards played, so even
> if you use the SBA #'s you are ball parking your play departures. PE tops out
> at 100%.

I think you got your BEs and PEs mixed up.

> Getting your $$ on the felt at the right time is the most important
> thing about counting.

Amen!

-Sonny-
 

Rob McGarvey

Well-Known Member
> BE tops out at 70%. Each index is also a composite of cards played, so even
> if you use the SBA #'s you are ball parking your play departures. PE tops out
> at 100%.

"I think you got your BEs and PEs mixed up."

Yes! A slip of the finger.

> Getting your $$ on the felt at the right time is the most important
> thing about counting.

And all Thorp's people said??

"Amen!"

PE tops out at 70%. Each index is also a composite of cards played, so even
if you use the SBA #'s you are ball parking your play departures.

A-10
51 60 85 125 169 122 117 43 -52 -180 =.703

BE tops out at 100%.

A-10
-9 5 6 8 11 6 4 0 -3 -7 = 1.00

From Theory of Blackjack.

I like how Bryce Carlson takes these numbers, tosses in the 10 count then boils them down to the numbers that compose his O II and AO II systems.
 
Top