jack.jackson
Well-Known Member
The count:
02334320-1-3 0
BC .937
PE.666
IC. 85
Note:This is a unbalanced count of +4
1.Aces would be sidecounted and valued x@ -4 each, to create a balanced count for betting purposes..So TCs could be made.
2.Since Aces are sidecounted, we value them @ +1 EACH, for playing purposes.(Unbalanced)
3. And +1 each for Insurance decisions.(Unbalanced)
BC .997(-4)
PE.678(+1)
IC.87(+1)
So you keep a SC of aces and multiply that number, depending on the situation. For example 5 aces counted x -4 = -20 for betting purposes. Which creates a balanced count...for tc, calculations.(note: this is more accurate than traditional side counting)
Or if you were making a playing decision you would add 4x1=+4 to your count.
which gives a unbalanced point count system of positive 5.
Conclusion: So we have a balanced count for betting, and unbalanced counts for playing and insurance decions.
BETTING0(02334320-1-3-4)
PLAYING+5,(12334320-1-3,0)
INSURANCE+5(12334320-1-3,0)
I knows this seems pretty complex but is it possible to use 1 count for bettimg, but a unbalanced count for playing decions.
It seems counters with both knowledge of unbalanced and balanced counts would be able to pull this off. Any takers?
02334320-1-3 0
BC .937
PE.666
IC. 85
Note:This is a unbalanced count of +4
1.Aces would be sidecounted and valued x@ -4 each, to create a balanced count for betting purposes..So TCs could be made.
2.Since Aces are sidecounted, we value them @ +1 EACH, for playing purposes.(Unbalanced)
3. And +1 each for Insurance decisions.(Unbalanced)
BC .997(-4)
PE.678(+1)
IC.87(+1)
So you keep a SC of aces and multiply that number, depending on the situation. For example 5 aces counted x -4 = -20 for betting purposes. Which creates a balanced count...for tc, calculations.(note: this is more accurate than traditional side counting)
Or if you were making a playing decision you would add 4x1=+4 to your count.
which gives a unbalanced point count system of positive 5.
Conclusion: So we have a balanced count for betting, and unbalanced counts for playing and insurance decions.
BETTING0(02334320-1-3-4)
PLAYING+5,(12334320-1-3,0)
INSURANCE+5(12334320-1-3,0)
I knows this seems pretty complex but is it possible to use 1 count for bettimg, but a unbalanced count for playing decions.
It seems counters with both knowledge of unbalanced and balanced counts would be able to pull this off. Any takers?
Last edited: