QFIT >> Good answer.StandardDeviant said:When you can keep the TC in hexadecimal.
A sign of American prudism. The original term was sexigesmal. In Babylonian times, this was base 60. But, for the LGP-30 and RPC-4000 computers built in the 50s, base 16 was called sexigesmal instead of hexadecimal.StandardDeviant said:When you can keep the TC in hexadecimal.
I wish the count got high enough so the hex number is different than the base 10 number :grin:StandardDeviant said:When you can keep the TC in hexadecimal.
Hexadecimal makes more sense, coming from Gr. hekkadekai, meaning sixteen. If you wanted to use a Latin root, you'd call it sedecimal.QFIT said:A sign of American prudism. The original term was sexigesmal. In Babylonian times, this was base 60. But, for the LGP-30 and RPC-4000 computers built in the 50s, base 16 was called sexigesmal instead of hexadecimal.
Maybe if I count in sexigesmal, I can keep the pit bosses entranced long enough to jump my bets 1:20 or more! :laugh:QFIT said:A sign of American prudism. The original term was sexigesmal.
Hey, I've had days where I just wanted the count to get high enough to differ from binary.21forme said:I wish the count got high enough so the hex number is different than the base 10 number :grin:
Haven't we all...QFIT said:Hey, I've had days where I just wanted the count to get high enough to differ from binary.
And let me guess...to get the true count, you have to divide by 2.iCountNTrack said:When you can count the cards and the freckles on the cocktail's girl's chest at the same time :grin:
StandardDeviant, can you name the practice blackjack software that isn't truly random? Sure would like to know which software is "fixed" with a predictable RNG, before considering buying it.StandardDeviant said:When you start noticing that the random number generator in your practice software truly isn't random...
None are "truly random".JSTAT said:StandardDeviant, can you name the practice blackjack software that isn't truly random? Sure would like to know which software is "fixed" with a predictable RNG, before considering buying it.
You took the words right out of my mouth. (Apologies to Meatloaf.)daddybo said:None are "truly random".
Quite right, an RNG is not truly random, but StandardDeviantdaddybo said:None are "truly random".
Computer guys rarely bother with the word pseudo-random. Since nothing is random, there is no point in writing the extra two syllables.StandardDeviant said:You took the words right out of my mouth. (Apologies to Meatloaf.)
For our intents and purposes they can be considered random, but they are pseudo-random. I'll leave it to the computer guys on here to explain why in more detail.