Mimosine
Well-Known Member
I understand when it is and when it is not appropriate to play insurance.
In another thread http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showthread.php?t=5392
the discussion of drawing heat playing insurance on hands like 14-16 (in particular) came up.
And in my first ever insurance play (that i won) i was in a similar situation, and i kind of had a sinking feeling when it worked out, realizing that it was a pretty blatent move.
but the whole point of insurance is that it is a side bet, one that pays 2:1 giving you an effective push if you win it. well what about this as a cover play (or maybe the worst play ever!), what if you insured someone else's hand!?! would the casino allow you to push chips in front of someone else's hand?
a few initial thoughts prompted me to ask someone who knows better than me:
1) you could technically put out more than half YOUR bet, as you could insure a higher-roller's hand.
2) you could "look" like a complete idiot to the casino i.e. this person really thinks they are insuring a hand (vs. the reality of it being a side bet), maybe this would require an act
or 3) you could look to the casino like an AP, the most obvious one on earth.
any comments/thoughts/or beratings!
thanks in advance.
In another thread http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showthread.php?t=5392
the discussion of drawing heat playing insurance on hands like 14-16 (in particular) came up.
And in my first ever insurance play (that i won) i was in a similar situation, and i kind of had a sinking feeling when it worked out, realizing that it was a pretty blatent move.
but the whole point of insurance is that it is a side bet, one that pays 2:1 giving you an effective push if you win it. well what about this as a cover play (or maybe the worst play ever!), what if you insured someone else's hand!?! would the casino allow you to push chips in front of someone else's hand?
a few initial thoughts prompted me to ask someone who knows better than me:
1) you could technically put out more than half YOUR bet, as you could insure a higher-roller's hand.
2) you could "look" like a complete idiot to the casino i.e. this person really thinks they are insuring a hand (vs. the reality of it being a side bet), maybe this would require an act
or 3) you could look to the casino like an AP, the most obvious one on earth.
any comments/thoughts/or beratings!
thanks in advance.