Is this 2deck worse than a shoe?

p8ntballsk8r

Well-Known Member
a double deck game with H17, DOA, noDAS, noSurrender, RSA, Pen=75% best, 50% worst)

verses a 6deck game H17, DOA, DAS, RSA, (possibly surrender)Pen=80 or 90%

Also, can someone tell me if it is really worth it to play at the surrender table with more people, or at a non surrender table by myself.
 
a double deck game with H17, DOA, noDAS, noSurrender, RSA, Pen=75% best, 50% worst)

verses a 6deck game H17, DOA, DAS, RSA, (possibly surrender)Pen=80 or 90%

It depends. The DD game is better with 75% pen and worse with 50% pen. Unless you have 90% pen and surrender at the 6D game.



Also, can someone tell me if it is really worth it to play at the surrender table with more people, or at a non surrender table by myself.

Yes, a surrender game is almost always better. Playing by yourself increases the speed, but you usually don't get to play by yourself for very long.
 
I think stanford wong or henry tambourine had a chart on the effects of deck penetration! Has anybody seen or heard of these charts?
 
I think stanford wong or henry tambourine had a chart on the effects of deck penetration! Has anybody seen or heard of these charts?
it's treated in Snyder's Blackbelt in Blackjack.
also CVBJ & cvcx can generate charts and graphs regarding penetration
 
Back
Top