Is this correct???

[Thunder]

From what I gather, it seems like you actually will earn money when the count is 0, see http://www.bjmath.com/bjmath/conseq/streak.htm (Archive copy)
I don't see how this can be right unless I'm missing something.

 

[EasyRhino]

Not sure what the rules of the game are, but it might be possible with a single deck game from 40 years ago.

 

[Thunder]

That's what I was thinking too. I'd be curious to know what data that was based on.

 

[Kasi]

That's what I was thinking too. I'd be curious to know what data that was based on.

Seems a little weird - lower win rate, higher loss rate and lower tie rate compared to overall.

31% of hands played at zero?

Maybe truncating 0.9 counts to zero? Floating advantage where a TC 0 is worth more at the end of a shoe than the beginning?

Even the overall W/L/T percentages seem slightly off, at least for a multi-deck game.

Maybe Norm will satisfy our curiosity.