zengrifter
Banned
**my responses -
This is an interesting post. When I first found this hobby (lifestyle, habit, career, call it what you will), my impression was that the hi-lo count was the most efficient and accurate count there was. It seems to be the backbone for all "serious" or "pro" counts.
**not any more, not since the SCOREs.
In my reading I only later discovered the "unbalanced" count. It seems like while you'd have an easier time from the start...it would be just as hard to later switch to a balanced count as it wouldbe to learn it from the get go...old habits die hard and such. Do you advocate learning an unbalanced count...building proficiency and then switching once you reach a certain level? I made a commitment to hone my hi-lo skills before I started toying with other counts, and I'm intent on doing so. But I certainly would like to know your reasoning behind the preference.
**there would be no need to switch counts - one could keep the KO and switch to 'TKO'(true-counted KO). according to Karl Jamacek TKO is slightly stronger than HiLo.
You have often been a champion for accuracy, encouraging index knowledge that some have called overkill. So I would have guessed that you would shy away from the unbalanced counts.
**I have added about 14 addt'l #s to KO preferred, composite fore 1-2D ('KO-zg'?)
I'm glad to see you posting again. Your volume and content was missed and I know that there are a lot of us who are waiting to see what you choose to share with us.
**thank you... its why my interview was posted exclusively at this venue! zg
This is an interesting post. When I first found this hobby (lifestyle, habit, career, call it what you will), my impression was that the hi-lo count was the most efficient and accurate count there was. It seems to be the backbone for all "serious" or "pro" counts.
**not any more, not since the SCOREs.
In my reading I only later discovered the "unbalanced" count. It seems like while you'd have an easier time from the start...it would be just as hard to later switch to a balanced count as it wouldbe to learn it from the get go...old habits die hard and such. Do you advocate learning an unbalanced count...building proficiency and then switching once you reach a certain level? I made a commitment to hone my hi-lo skills before I started toying with other counts, and I'm intent on doing so. But I certainly would like to know your reasoning behind the preference.
**there would be no need to switch counts - one could keep the KO and switch to 'TKO'(true-counted KO). according to Karl Jamacek TKO is slightly stronger than HiLo.
You have often been a champion for accuracy, encouraging index knowledge that some have called overkill. So I would have guessed that you would shy away from the unbalanced counts.
**I have added about 14 addt'l #s to KO preferred, composite fore 1-2D ('KO-zg'?)
I'm glad to see you posting again. Your volume and content was missed and I know that there are a lot of us who are waiting to see what you choose to share with us.
**thank you... its why my interview was posted exclusively at this venue! zg