BlackjackDan
Member
I've been using KO for a while and I am looking for something that is a little better. I like the fact the KO is unbalanced and no deck estimations are necessary so I am looking for something similar. What is your take on it?
I think unbalanced Zen is just as good as balanced Zen so I think it is definately worth the switch. Although I think Automatic Monkey used to use an unbalanced count that was really easy and powerful. That might be worth looking at.BlackjackDan said:I've been using KO for a while and I am looking for something that is a little better. I like the fact the KO is unbalanced and no deck estimations are necessary so I am looking for something similar. What is your take on it?
You will have to get the book or really its a brochure called "The Unbalanced Zen 2" by George C. It runs about $20, just do a search and it will come up who sells it. I don't think Ken sells it here that's why I had to get it elsewhere, but I don't remember who I bought it from. It mainly focuses on double deck.BlackjackDan said:You mentioned unbalanced Zen. Can that be found in "Blackbelt in Blackjack" along with balanced Zen?
I think it IS IF its adequately mastered. zgSystemsTrader said:I should also mention if you just play against 6 and 8 deck shoes, it is not worth switching from KO to UBZ2.
hi, relative beginner here. i have been considering switching from KO to UBZ2; i haven't yet because from what i have read, the betting correlation is higher with KO, and that BC is what is important when playing 6 & 8 deck shoes... is this the case? if so, then why would UBZ2 be a better choice for 6 & 8 deck shoes if adequately mastered? the fact that it's level 2?zengrifter said:I think it IS IF its adequately mastered. zg