MIT team

Harman

Well-Known Member
I don't understand why the MIT team had to carry the money they were to gamble with on their person through airport security. Why didn't they put in their suitcase, or get it from a bank in Vegas... anyone??
 

moo321

Well-Known Member
People can steal from your suitcase. And its more likely to get noticed, and be considered drug money.
 

Nutorious

Member
Well they wouldn't of wanted to put it in their banks because mr tax man would of taken a nice sum out of it! So say they won say 100,000 stuck it in their bank, the tax man (in england anways) would have take 40% (40,000) off that. So you would be left with only 60,000 thats most likely why!
 

Harman

Well-Known Member
I thought gambling money wasn't taxed :confused: Am I wrong, and how would it get noticed in a suitcase?
 

Nutorious

Member
EVERYTHING you make money on is taxed. Shares, bonds, inhertience even the bank interest they give you depending on the tax bracket you are in!
 

EasyRhino

Well-Known Member
and, according to the book, the protagonist in Breaking Vegas accurately paid and filed taxes every year on the gambling winnings.

Using a bank in Vegas makes a lot of sense, although there's always a chance that information could somehow find its way from a bank employee to casino management, and that would be a bummer.

Also, the team played in many locales other than Vegas.

Also, banks are usually closed on weekends.
 

Harman

Well-Known Member
Are you sure they tax your winnings on blackjack, I'm sure this is incorrect :confused:

I can't believe they wold take 40,000 of a 100,000 win. I know they take it out of 100,000 p.a. salary, but surely not a blackjack win :eek:
 

Nutorious

Member
Yes they can. They tax everything here, i know for sure! My dad is in the 40% tax bracket and absolutly everything he makes money on he HAS to declare it. No matter what it is.

(Dead link: http://www.gamblingtherapy.org/ShowThread.aspx?ID=512414)

look at that forum. He is talking about how he has to send onf a cheque for 23k+ out of his 75k winnings.
 

RJT

Well-Known Member
Nutorious said:
Well they wouldn't of wanted to put it in their banks because mr tax man would of taken a nice sum out of it! So say they won say 100,000 stuck it in their bank, the tax man (in england anways) would have take 40% (40,000) off that. So you would be left with only 60,000 thats most likely why!
You are wrong on this - in the UK. The way it stands at the moment, you don't pay taxes on gambling winnings in the UK. This was due to a court ruling that if you paid taxes on winnings, losses would have to be tax deductable. As the public lose more money than they win, the government decided it was best just to leave it non-taxable.
As to the reason that the MIT team carried large sums of money, there are several reasons. Any time large sums of money are moved through financial institutes evidence has to be shown as to the money's source. This is simply to protect against money laundering. While the team did have perfectly legitimate and legal explinations for where the money had come from, they weren't easy to explain. It was easier to shift the money in the form of cash.
This also avoids bank charges, which as the sums get larger get substancial, lack of liquidity due to delays with banking services and letting anyone outside of their group know what was going on.
The reason that they didn't carry it in suitcases is that x-ray machines show money up quite clearly and you can count on it that anyone carrying $60k in a suitcase through an airport is going to have a few questions to answer.

RJT.
 

Harman

Well-Known Member
RJT said:
As to the reason that the MIT team carried large sums of money, there are several reasons. Any time large sums of money are moved through financial institutes evidence has to be shown as to the money's source. This is simply to protect against money laundering. While the team did have perfectly legitimate and legal explinations for where the money had come from, they weren't easy to explain. It was easier to shift the money in the form of cash.
This also avoids bank charges, which as the sums get larger get substancial, lack of liquidity due to delays with banking services and letting anyone outside of their group know what was going on.
The reason that they didn't carry it in suitcases is that x-ray machines show money up quite clearly and you can count on it that anyone carrying $60k in a suitcase through an airport is going to have a few questions to answer.

RJT.

Thanks RJT, great post, I get it now, nice one :grin:
 

MJ1

Well-Known Member
RJT said:
While the team did have perfectly legitimate and legal explinations for where the money had come from, they weren't easy to explain. It was easier to shift the money in the form of cash.
I'm not so sure about this one. I would much rather try and give an honest explanation to a bank manager rather than risk some $5/hr security guard at the airport confiscate my 60k. Also, they might strip search you if they discover you have a large sum of money hidden beneath your jacket.

If you wire the money to Vegas, there is literally no risk of having your money confiscated.

This also avoids bank charges, which as the sums get larger get substantial, lack of liquidity due to delays with banking services and letting anyone outside of their group know what was going on.
So the more money I wire, the more I will have to pay in bank charges? I never really wire money so maybe somebody here can confirm this one.

Also, if you wire the money to a bank in Vegas, shouldn't that money be available for withdrawal the following business day?

MJ
 

BJinNJ

Well-Known Member
Yes, banks charge to wire money. $15 last I did it.

Another way one might try would be to set up 2 PayPal accounts with
separate email addresses. One connected to your home bank, the
other to your bank account in LV. Then you could email yourself money
using PayPal, and use an ATM to access it.

BJinNJ :cool:
 

21forme

Well-Known Member
Paypal takes out about 2%, just like any credit card merchant account. It's much cheaper to wire money, if you don't want to carry it with you. Or, just bank with a branch in LV.
 

EasyRhino

Well-Known Member
Also, ATM limits won't disburse enough cash to make higher stakes play workable (I'm not familiar with any ATM limits over $2000 a day)

It's not even necessary to wire the funds to a bank in Vegas, just have an account with a bank that has a branch in Vegas. (with a wire, it is necessary to have a bank account, you can't just wire it to a 7-11). But again, if you're making withdrawals from a local bank, there's the risk of unwanted information sharing (and they're still closed on weekends)

And you don't want to wire it to a casino's cage (or set up a line of credit) if you're trying to obfuscate your identity.
 

MJ1

Well-Known Member
EasyRhino said:
It's not even necessary to wire the funds to a bank in Vegas, just have an account with a bank that has a branch in Vegas. (with a wire, it is necessary to have a bank account, you can't just wire it to a 7-11).
Good idea. But what if my local bank does not have a branch in Vegas, would I still be able to wire the money from my bank to a completely different bank?

I would probably have to set-up an account at the bank in Vegas before sending the wire from my local bank, so I am not sure how that would work.

Can money from one's bank account be wired via the net or do you have to actually visit the bank?

And you don't want to wire it to a casino's cage (or set up a line of credit) if you're trying to obfuscate your identity.
Not sure where I stand on that one. I might want to earn comps while I play, which means I would either have to reveal my identity or give them a fake ID. But that is the least of my concerns at the moment.

MJ
 
MJ1 said:
I'm not so sure about this one. I would much rather try and give an honest explanation to a bank manager rather than risk some $5/hr security guard at the airport confiscate my 60k. Also, they might strip search you if they discover you have a large sum of money hidden beneath your jacket.

If you wire the money to Vegas, there is literally no risk of having your money confiscated.



So the more money I wire, the more I will have to pay in bank charges? I never really wire money so maybe somebody here can confirm this one.

Also, if you wire the money to a bank in Vegas, shouldn't that money be available for withdrawal the following business day?

MJ
You are absolutely correct in this. Using a bank to transport money eliminates the risk of several problems. Confiscation by authorities and arrest is one, getting robbed or worse is another. If you are carrying $60K on your person you are now a target attractive to professional criminals for whom the decision to leave you alive or dead is as mathematical as the decision to raise our bet is to us.

There are probably very few of us who need access to more than $10K in new cash every day, and those in that category I am sure have had to deal with the problem of money transfer between venues. Probably 2 or 3 bank accounts can cover every gaming venue in the US and the wire transfer fee between them is a small expense for a high stakes player.
 

RJT

Well-Known Member
MJ1 said:
Good idea. But what if my local bank does not have a branch in Vegas, would I still be able to wire the money from my bank to a completely different bank?

I would probably have to set-up an account at the bank in Vegas before sending the wire from my local bank, so I am not sure how that would work.

Can money from one's bank account be wired via the net or do you have to actually visit the bank?



Not sure where I stand on that one. I might want to earn comps while I play, which means I would either have to reveal my identity or give them a fake ID. But that is the least of my concerns at the moment.

MJ
And when you are arriving in LV at 8pm on Friday night for a heavy night playing - what then? Maybe LV banks have different opening hours to the ones i know, but i've certainly never encountered a bank open past 6pm.
And as to comps - they did earn comps, just under different names. You give your bank details over, you've got to give your real name and connections can be made between players.

RJT.
 

zengrifter

Banned
Nutorious said:
Well they wouldn't of wanted to put it in their banks because mr tax man would of taken a nice sum out of it! So say they won say 100,000 stuck it in their bank, the tax man (in england anways) would have take 40% (40,000) off that. So you would be left with only 60,000 thats most likely why!
So you are speculating that the MITs cheated on their taxes? zg
 
Top