My Two-Double Winning Scheme

[davidmcclung]

Surprisingly, the following scheme is working real well for easy $100 plus wins and no losses to date in 5 sessions and about 25 hrs of playing. Playing on 6 deck, $5 minimum tables. Here it is: *******New Shoe: Bet $5 initially and keep at $5 bets until the following. Wait for one loss to start the sequence. After the first loss in the new shoe, then wait for TWO CONSECUTIVE WINS, then after the two consecutive wins then double your bet to $10 and keep at $10 for the remainder of the shoe. A double down win or split win just counts as one win as to the two consecutive win criteria. Then start over again with the same sequence on the start of the next shoe. The session bankroll is also very important, $500 session bankroll which is 100 bets at the low bet level, and 50 bets at the high bet level. I am very surprised how well this is winning so if you are looking for a new non-counting BJ scheme, then consider playing above AND post your results. I bet that you will be equally impressed and of course must know and play sound basic strategy and using my Two Double Winning Scheme this gives me a good feeling of being able to walk out with some of the casino $$, at least so far it is easy wins..

 

[shadroch]

Thats an okay system,but consider this one.
Find a blonde,female dealer at a table that includes at least one,but no more than three red-headed females.Play the table minimum until both you and the red-heads have lost three hands in a row off a new shoe.Raise your bet to 5X the table minimum until you see the cocktail waitress.
You'll be amazed how much fun you can have using this method and quite often you'll win at least one hand.Even without using basic strategy.
Please play this and post the results.Sadly,this method can't be practiced at your kitchen table or simulated on a computer,but it works.

 

[Sonny]

It’s barely a progression system at all, which I guess is a compliment. It’s really just like flat betting $10 most of the time. You should expect about the same results as flat betting. The EV will be about the same and the probability of winning a session will be about the same.

-Sonny-

 

[davidmcclung]

Latest two wins with my Two Double Scheme were $240 and $400, surprising big wins for such low $ amount of bets. Still playing with $500 session bankroll for $5 initial bets, then $10 bets once the two consecutive wins after a loss trigger occurs.. On the bad losing shoes I had mininal number of $10 bets as did not win the two in the row after a loss very often. Will wait for 10 sessions to be completed and then evaluate before increasing the bet size for perhaps even bigger wins, but for now I am very pleased with the winning amounts.

 

[zengrifter]

Latest two wins with my Two Double Scheme were $240 and $400, surprising big wins for such low $ amount of bets.

Keep us posted. zg

 

[The Stork]

Well

The only good thing would be to remove the complete section of progression crap. Made for people who are not able to accept the unacceptable. Because in the end all your pennies are gone for ever!!! Life is not about money but wrong decision making brings you definitely there where the slaves keeps on complaining about being treated wrongly.

Stork is swell:laugh:

 

[ChefJJ]

Life is not about money but wrong decision making brings you definitely there where the slaves keeps on complaining about being treated wrongly.

:flame: Huh?

 

[The Stork]

By using the world slave I mean the average person who enslaves him or herself for being accepted. By no mean I relate this to which color somebody comes from.

I wish I was black. I would have jump higher....LOL

 

[ChefJJ]

By using the world slave I mean the average person who enslaves him or herself for being accepted. By no mean I relate this to which color somebody comes from.

I wish I was black. I would have jump higher....LOL

I didn't really read anything racist into your first comment...just couldn't figure out what you meant.

good luck

 

[Dyepaintball12]

What if you lose 13 hands in a row?

 

[Kasi]

What if you lose 13 hands in a row?

Apparently then he will have lost about $65 unless it was after 2 consecuitive wins and then I guess he lost about a $130 lol.

 

[aslan]

Thats an okay system,but consider this one.
Find a blonde,female dealer at a table that includes at least one,but no more than three red-headed females.Play the table minimum until both you and the red-heads have lost three hands in a row off a new shoe.Raise your bet to 5X the table minimum until you see the cocktail waitress.
You'll be amazed how much fun you can have using this method and quite often you'll win at least one hand.Even without using basic strategy.
Please play this and post the results.Sadly,this method can't be practiced at your kitchen table or simulated on a computer,but it works.

And you can't beat the surroundings! I will try it with three blondes and/or redheads, as it is often difficult to find multiple redheads where I play. I believe the principle is the same, although I'm not sure and will have to let you know after the fact. I would not try this with brunettes for two reasons: (1) brunettes are commonplace possibly nullifying the statistical rarity of such an event; and (2) the fun factor. :dog:

 

[davidmcclung]

I have lost many consecutive bets, but usually at the minimum $5 level, which is recoverable. Occasionally have lost many at the $10 level, but not often. Played my Two Double scheme for many hrs over a two nighter period and just returned and won only $50 for the entire trip and was on many losing tables, but I had recently had some good $200 and $400 wins, so knew the big wins cannot continue indefinitely and it still produced a win which keeps the winning streak going. The most in the negative to date is only about $200, which is surprising and not a deep deficit considering playing with a $500 session bankroll. This is not a get rich scheme, but a grinder that has been consistently winning for 7 sessions now.

 

[sabre]

This is not a get rich scheme

Truer words were never spoken. But I doubt you really understand why.

 

[davidmcclung]

I do really like my Two Double Scheme but still undecided as to when to start the scheme on the new shoe. There is really no right or wrong answer here, it just depends on the individual session. Have had bigger wins with not using the one loss criteria before starting the scheme, but it does help to have the one loss before starting it on the shoe where you win two or three hands in a row initially then lose most of the other hands. But overall I do like the more aggressive approach with no waiting period and since I am playing still with only the $5 bet initially, I am going today to play the following: No waiting period, once I win two consecutive hands on the new shoe even if the first two hands, then increase to $10 bets and keep at $10 until the end of the shoe. Start the new shoe at $5 and keep at $5 until get the two consecutive wins no matter when they occur, then after getting the two consecutive wins, go to $10 bets until the end of the six deck shoe with $500 session bankroll.

 

[Sonny]

Start the new shoe at $5 and keep at $5 until get the two consecutive wins no matter when they occur, then after getting the two consecutive wins, go to $10 bets until the end of the six deck shoe with $500 session bankroll.

That’s a little bit worse than your original plan. You will be raising your bets sooner so your average bet will be higher. That means you will lose slightly more money overall. I imagine that the differences in EV and variance will be very small, but this system is just a bit worse than the original one.

With this new system your average bet is probably around $9. If you play 300 hands (about 3-5 hours depending on the crowd) with a $500 bankroll then you will lose it all about 0.5% of the time. For 500 hands you’ll lose it all about 3% of the time. Compare that to flat betting $5 and you get 0.00% and 0.01% respectively. The fact that you have cut your bankroll almost in half by doubling your bet so often will make a big difference in your short-term session results.

However, the difference between using this system and flat betting $10 will be almost insignificant in the short run.

-Sonny-