Omega II

Oghi

New Member
on Omega II

Sony,
what makes you think Omega II is more complex than Hi Opt II with an Ace side count, to me it's almost the same! please, coment! thnaks!!!
 

Sonny

Well-Known Member
They are nearly identical

The tags are the same except 9=-1 and 6=+2 (instead of +1). There is a mild improvement in the Insurance Correlation of the Hi-Opt II.

I use the Hi-Opt II myself, but I don't think it would be more difficult to learn the AOII. My only concern was that it is difficult for a beginner to pick up a level 2 system with an ace side count. Since I assumed that Nina was a beginner looking for a good system I thought I should mention that it can be a bit tough.

If you are moving up from a level 1 system, I think that both systems are excellent. I might also advise the Zen system since it avoids the side count. That makes it much simpler for playing shoe games. It captures almost all of the betting power and the same Insurance Correlation of AOII.

Any system will become second nature to you once you get enough practice, so if you are dedicated enough I highly recommend these 3 systems. Just my opinions.

-Sonny-
 

SammyBoy

Well-Known Member
Hi Nina

I started out with Hi/Lo and then switched to Advanced Omega II. At first it was very difficult, and I actually wondered if I would ever become as proficient with AOII as I was with Hi/Lo. In my opinion, if you are playing single and double deck AOII is the way to go. If you are willing to work at it and practice I believe anyone can learn this system. Are you using any counting system now?
 

Nina

Member
Basic Omega II

Yes, I've just started using the Basic Omega II and have been so far, successful with it.

How often do you play? I'm curious, what the average gain/loss is.
 

SammyBoy

Well-Known Member
Read This

It's a small sample, but check this out...

(Dead link: http://www.cardcounter.com/main.pl?read=9869)
 
Top