Progression question?

L

learning to count

Well-Known Member
Recently there has been a lot of serious disturbances in the force. I have read numerous articles in Bj21 and Advantageplayer.com about psuedo mathmatical speculations on the feasibilty of the perfect progression. In one post "AJ" posted a long article on his theory that he had proof that he had a progresson that would out do cardcounting... ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...uh um excuse me I fell asleep.
Where was I oh yeah. Well to make this a shorter post I will quote Mr. Don Schlesinger; Tuesday, 10 December 2002, at 9:13 a.m.;"To me, it is certainly a voodoo theory, with no apparent mathematical foundation whatsoever." In Response To: An interesting model (Advantage Jack).
Thats why we have Math experts on earth in order to put order in chaos and to teach math drop outs as my self the truth. Yet the discussion runs on....ZZZZZZZZZZZZ uh oh good night Mayor, good night ZG, good night Jim bob, Good night Rob Mcgarvey, Good night maa. Goodnight John boy, good night.
 
R

Rob McGarvey

Well-Known Member
Even Elly May Knows... *LINK*

that there is no progression that can beat a negative expectation game. We know that there is an optimum bet size of our bankroll for each expectancy. If I have a positive expectancy of 16% that gives me a lot of room for my bet sizing. I can make the optimum bet, less than optimum, or more than optimum. BJAttack shows us that using a risk aversive indice can increase our bottom line by ducking the risk factor until it becomes a little more productive. We can see that the Kelly Criterion applies to the stock market, and to blackjack in a similar manner. I also think that the principles of onLand blackjack have traversed the void into onLine blackjack in a similar fashion.

G'nite John Boy........smile
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top