As does Trump Plaza. As does Hilton. As does Taj Mahal.21forme said:Update for shadroch - Resorts now has a few 6 deck tables (S17, etc.) with $25 mins.
Was Harrah's recently bought out by a group of private investors? I was wondering if that is what I read somewhere.shadroch said:Thanks,its been awhile since I've looked around down there.I'm still in mourning over The Sands closing.
Which casinos are now hitting S17?
Let me quess....Harrahs properties?
Thx - maybe there's hope yet lol.EasyRhino said:old ownership, the private equity guys haven't really had a chance to change anything yet.
shadroch said:The deal is pretty much done,but its not sealed yet.I wouldn't look for any improvements.I'm imagining these guys bought Harrahs more for the worth of the real estate than the games.What is possible is that they may sell a few of the properties(Caesars?) to knock down the insane nut they are going to have combining all the ongoing expenses with their equity loans.
They might try to make 6:5 the standard. But before that I see them just phasing out blackjack. Why even bother dealing 6:5 when you have people lined up 3 deep at carnival games with a 3% edge? Today's typical gambler just plain doesn't care about winning.Kasi said:Thx. Sounds about right.
This 6-5 crap on 8 deck shoes has me worried it will become the norm just because they can get away with it.
I don't ask for much but that would make me stop playing.
I checked out Taj twice in the last 2 weeks. Only 6D games I saw there were in the high roller pit with $100 min. I even asked a PC and she confirmed it. Hmm...Automatic Monkey said:As does Trump Plaza. As does Hilton. As does Taj Mahal.
Automatic Monkey said:They might try to make 6:5 the standard. But before that I see them just phasing out blackjack. Why even bother dealing 6:5 when you have people lined up 3 deep at carnival games with a 3% edge? Today's typical gambler just plain doesn't care about winning.
But on the positive side it does look like the Harrah's conglomerate is selling off properties. More owners = more choices = better games available.
I've never understood the value of hold. To me it is utterly meaningless.dacium said:I don't know, I think you underestimate the hold blackjack gets. Watch how many people can't even get the most basics of basic strategy write (not hitting to 17 if dealer 7 or higher, not hitting to 12 if 6 or lower). Most players give a house edge of 5% to 10% and with repeated small bets so quickly, the hold ends up being extremely large for blackjack.
Kasi said:I've never understood the value of hold. To me it is utterly meaningless.
And I don't think most players, even really, really bad players, play at a 5-10% disadvantage.
It's really not possible to play that badlly. I hope lol.
They will never phase out black jack. If they could do that they would have done that a long time ago.Automatic Monkey said:They might try to make 6:5 the standard. But before that I see them just phasing out blackjack. Why even bother dealing 6:5 when you have people lined up 3 deep at carnival games with a 3% edge? Today's typical gambler just plain doesn't care about winning.
But on the positive side it does look like the Harrah's conglomerate is selling off properties. More owners = more choices = better games available.
Not really. How do u define "hold percentage"? Maybe vs "House Advantage"?shadroch said:You are joking,no? Most players I see(okay,a lot of them) lose their whole buy-in,not just 10%