Mimosine
Well-Known Member
I need a little clarification on the issue of going in on people's double downs on 10's and 11's. maybe this is a question for Renzey...
i completely understand going in half's on these hands, especially when the dealer up card is 2-6. But would it still be a winning propostition if you looked to the person next to you with a 10 or 11 and they were learly of you doubling with them- would it still be worth it to offer to pay back their bet if the hand looses?
in other words: they have a 1 unit bet out, you throw out 1 unit to double, if you win you each get 1 unit, if you lose you give your partner 1 unit more.
to me this makes sense at first, but maybe the overall return doesn't work out in your favor because you always have the chance of losing 2 units, but the most you could win is 1. and i think the odds of winning on a double against a low card are only like 55-60%
can someone give me a quick answer on this. sorry if it is so moronic that i can't see the answer on my own
i completely understand going in half's on these hands, especially when the dealer up card is 2-6. But would it still be a winning propostition if you looked to the person next to you with a 10 or 11 and they were learly of you doubling with them- would it still be worth it to offer to pay back their bet if the hand looses?
in other words: they have a 1 unit bet out, you throw out 1 unit to double, if you win you each get 1 unit, if you lose you give your partner 1 unit more.
to me this makes sense at first, but maybe the overall return doesn't work out in your favor because you always have the chance of losing 2 units, but the most you could win is 1. and i think the odds of winning on a double against a low card are only like 55-60%
can someone give me a quick answer on this. sorry if it is so moronic that i can't see the answer on my own