Re: "no midshoe entry"
I played in windsor recently the "no midshoe entry" rule actually made for an interesting game. I did not do so well in the session overall but that was not because of the rule.
Here is what I think,, first choose a table where the dealer gives a decent penetration. I was told the house policy is 2.5 decks cut of. Looks like some dealers do not want to take any chances and lob 3 off of 8D shoe. Some dealers however cut off only 1.5 or even less. These seems like worthwhile games, if the shoe goes positive. This leads to the interestig part about the "no midshoe entry"
Playing during non crowded , that is the non bus crowd, hours.i found some tables with only a few other players..after about a deck if the count had not gone positive i would take my hand out but stay at the table. sometimes if the shoe really went south , the other players would also leave one by one, resulting in an early reshuffle since i could not reeter the game. During early morning hours i had my choice of a few tables to play by myself. there if i did not like the count, i simply pulled b ack and "shuffle ! ". kind of preferntial shuffling but to the players advantage and control.
the vip game is good also when they have $25 tables availble. 6D, hand shuffle, and with conversion rate, the min bet is really equal to about $15 US. same "no midshoe entry" rule b ut, you still have the same back end wonging advantage