zengrifter
Banned
Auto-Monk writes -
"I use 33 in shoe games and that gets me to 90% of the EV of full index play with lower variance."
My response -
I advocate 50-60+... and they DO count even in shoe games (see THopper report). 33 (+count) numbers is quite sufficient... BUT more indices REDUCE variance NOT increase it. zg
---------------------------
Posted By: Automatic Monkey
Date: 4/1/04 7:55:08 p.m.
In Response To: Be sure the read the Zengrifter Interview (The Mayor)
Read it. Interesting, but please forgive me if I limit the advice I take from persons in prison! Suffice it to say that I would run like hell if I saw him at the table. I've also got to question the accuracy of his statement that it is desirable to play 100+ indexes, even with Hi-Opt II. Well, maybe in SD there are that many comp-dependent that are worth playing. I use 33 in shoe games and that gets me to 90% of the EV of full index play with lower variance. All in all a great interview though, I love the cover tricks! Flipping a coin, and such.
"I use 33 in shoe games and that gets me to 90% of the EV of full index play with lower variance."
My response -
I advocate 50-60+... and they DO count even in shoe games (see THopper report). 33 (+count) numbers is quite sufficient... BUT more indices REDUCE variance NOT increase it. zg
---------------------------
Posted By: Automatic Monkey
Date: 4/1/04 7:55:08 p.m.
In Response To: Be sure the read the Zengrifter Interview (The Mayor)
Read it. Interesting, but please forgive me if I limit the advice I take from persons in prison! Suffice it to say that I would run like hell if I saw him at the table. I've also got to question the accuracy of his statement that it is desirable to play 100+ indexes, even with Hi-Opt II. Well, maybe in SD there are that many comp-dependent that are worth playing. I use 33 in shoe games and that gets me to 90% of the EV of full index play with lower variance. All in all a great interview though, I love the cover tricks! Flipping a coin, and such.