Ok, I FINALLY got around to reading your TH Basic.... Sorry it took so long.
Excerpt from your T-H Basic book, pg. 31:
The T-H Basic playing strategy is not designed to have the highest possible expectation at all times. In fact, the expectation is lower than standard basic strategy if the same amount is bet at all times.
**I think you're mistaken. Consider: if the above-statement is true, why even vary playing in accordance to counts? It's to obtain a higher EV, no? If you can obtain a higher expectation with standard BS, then you certainly will only play BS. I think you touched on what you mean is what you state in the latter sentence, "it is a dollar-weighted strategy, which means the expectation will be greater in the higher counts when more money is bet..." Any descent count system will have an expectation that's higher than BS with just the play variations--that's why you start off with BS and then vary your play in accordance to the count. What's different about most UB systems is the fact that they have a higher BE, whereas TC'ing produces a higher PE.
Also, on page 66, I'm not sure if this is a mistake, but, if you scan the ROI/100 for the 2-player table, the % goes down with more decks. At the full tables, they jump dramatically at the 4D, basically implying that the 4D games at FULL TABLES are superior to all the 2-player games?
Excerpt from your T-H Basic book, pg. 31:
The T-H Basic playing strategy is not designed to have the highest possible expectation at all times. In fact, the expectation is lower than standard basic strategy if the same amount is bet at all times.
**I think you're mistaken. Consider: if the above-statement is true, why even vary playing in accordance to counts? It's to obtain a higher EV, no? If you can obtain a higher expectation with standard BS, then you certainly will only play BS. I think you touched on what you mean is what you state in the latter sentence, "it is a dollar-weighted strategy, which means the expectation will be greater in the higher counts when more money is bet..." Any descent count system will have an expectation that's higher than BS with just the play variations--that's why you start off with BS and then vary your play in accordance to the count. What's different about most UB systems is the fact that they have a higher BE, whereas TC'ing produces a higher PE.
Also, on page 66, I'm not sure if this is a mistake, but, if you scan the ROI/100 for the 2-player table, the % goes down with more decks. At the full tables, they jump dramatically at the 4D, basically implying that the 4D games at FULL TABLES are superior to all the 2-player games?