A lot of people posted responses about "the shoe from hell"
where the count is growing constanly. I remembered my shoe of heaven; it
went to the complete opposite. Two players, 3 spots opens (I had two)
The true count(multileveled) rose quickly (within 2 or 3 turns)
to a +4. At this point, the odds were even (or almost). After,
the TC remained constant for the rest of the shoe. I split hands,
doubled down, got maybe 2 BJ, everything was winning and I kept raising
my bets by 1 units after successful DD or SP.
Stability in the count is good for the player; the dealer shows a
small card -> a 10 in the hole; you need to double down(two small
cards) -> another 10.
More formally, If you are playing a shoe using pure BS and the next 26 cards contains exactly eight 10s, which correspond to an average, then
your EV is about 1% over the EV of the game.*
*I got a D- to my programming course; I suggest you to check this out
GUI
where the count is growing constanly. I remembered my shoe of heaven; it
went to the complete opposite. Two players, 3 spots opens (I had two)
The true count(multileveled) rose quickly (within 2 or 3 turns)
to a +4. At this point, the odds were even (or almost). After,
the TC remained constant for the rest of the shoe. I split hands,
doubled down, got maybe 2 BJ, everything was winning and I kept raising
my bets by 1 units after successful DD or SP.
Stability in the count is good for the player; the dealer shows a
small card -> a 10 in the hole; you need to double down(two small
cards) -> another 10.
More formally, If you are playing a shoe using pure BS and the next 26 cards contains exactly eight 10s, which correspond to an average, then
your EV is about 1% over the EV of the game.*
*I got a D- to my programming course; I suggest you to check this out
GUI