These index #'s cant possibly be right........

[jack.jackson]

.......But ive ran Cv index twice and i do believe they are....Using "Greater Accuracy" Resilution to the nearest deck, I got some weird results using this L3 count2-A(2223210-1-2-3) Only refer to the indexes A6-A9 through dealers 9. Disregard others. I was curious what kind of efficiency this count would have for paticular hands such as A6-A9 and Hard doubles and man was i surprised. Especially A8, A7 and A8v8. Wow, you mean I can double A8v8 this hand when the TC is -4 or greater. And take a look at some of the hard double below the top chart.

 

[jack.jackson]

Take a look at these hard doubles. Diregard 11Examples: Doubling 10 v X,A at +1> and higher. Doubling 9v8 @+2 and higher. And doubling 7v6@ -5> and higher. I personaly selected these hands b/c i knew this count would have awesome effeciency with hard doubles(excluding11) and soft doubles(A6-A9) because the weight of the Ace and 5(2223210-1-2-3) but i never imagined you would be doubling 7v6 in a negative count though. This index simms were set up for double deck. Would someone care to ascertain these numbers? Even splitting XXv6(not listed) @+4 was remarkable. With a 12 point count. All i can say is Wow!

 

[QFIT]

All those zeroes in the first chart suggest a problem with the seed strategy tables. Go to Tools then Export and send me the export file. [email protected]

 

[jack.jackson]

It seems my files are corrupted. Im getting a compression error:70 when i click on the file. I think the problem may lie on my end. Windows Explorer has closed on me a few times lately. Looks like I may have to do disk check or restore the system or some basic maintenance. Ive been running the puter pretty hard the last couple months. Ill try re-installing as a last resort.Stand-by.