checking it outjohndoe said:Surrendering is correct for a H17 game (dealer hits on soft 17's), but standing is correct for a S17 game. That's probably the source of your confusion.
http://wizardofodds.com/blackjack/strategy/4deck.html
-65%?!?! I see ~-51.3%. -65% sounds waaay too big.iCountNTrack said:Surrendering your hard 17 against the dealer's ace is the correct play as the expectation value for standing is -65% while that of surrendering is -50%.
This includes the total ev including the dealer possibly having a BJ,SleightOfHand said:-65%?!?! I see ~-51.3%. -65% sounds waaay too big.
This true for late surrender, for early surrender, surrendering is the correct play regardless of whether you have an S17 or H17 gmae, but i guess ES vs Ace is a thing of the pastjohndoe said:Surrendering is correct for a H17 game (dealer hits on soft 17's), but standing is correct for a S17 game. That's probably the source of your confusion.
http://wizardofodds.com/blackjack/strategy/4deck.html
Nope, #11. H17 = Dealer Hits Soft 17.politcat said:edit: seminole rules... dealer hits on soft 17; double any card; double after split; 8 decks; insurance on ace. So it looks like it's #9 from above. Did I get that right?
ok, #11. these abbreviations don't all make sense to meduanedibley said:Nope, #11. H17 = Dealer Hits Soft 17.
Will you be counting?
It looks like your game has a house edge of 0.66% and I believe the minimum is $25 per hand, unless you want to play the CSM game (which is un-countable) for a $10 minimum.
Be careful
as I posted above, that's the game (bold txt) at the seminole casino here...you certainly don’t want to play those horrible 6:5 BJ payoffs or an ugly 8 deck dealer hits soft 17 game.