top counting methods.ko near the bottom of the heap

[eyesfor21]

Score for mainly singl/double

Strategy

100

Uston APC
100

Canfield Master
98

Omega II with Side Count
97

Omega II No Side Count
88

Hi-Opt II with Side Count
80

Omega II with Side Count I18
75

Zen Count
73

Canfield Expert
73

Hi-Lo Full indexes
71

Revere Point Count
70

Wong Halves
67

Hi-Opt I with Side Count
66

Red Seven Extended
66

Hi-Opt I No Side Count
62

Revere Adv. Plus-Minus
62

Unb. Zen 11
59

Revere Point Count I18
59

Silver Fox
58

Uston Adv. Plus-Minus
56

Uston SS
55

Hi-Lo
54

K-O
50

Red Seven

 

[Cyrano]

What's your source?

 

[Automatic Monkey]

How about for shoe?

We have seen the future of blackjack, and it has 6 or 8 decks. KO has slightly better parameters for those kinds of games, what with it's high BC.

Either way KO is fine for an occasional player who is always playing the same number of decks (so he doesn't have to mess with too many index numbers) and who is going to make enough mistakes with a level 2 or 3 count as to make it less powerful than KO. But it doesn't seem like a good system for a player who is going to be playing a lot of different games.

 

[Stealth Bomber]

Yes, what's your source?

 

[Cyrano]

I think I know where.. *LINK*

He probably used QFit's blackjack strategy advisor, which seems to be highly subjective based on your assessment of your strengths and weaknesses and what you're comfortable with. I wouldn't pay too much attention to the chart since it has no bearing on system performances.