Here’s an interesting case that happened during my Vegas trip. I have a total of 10 and the dealer has a 6 showing. Of course, I already have my red chip in my hand, ready to double. The guy just before me has a 15 and he obviously waves for a stand. Dealer (seemingly very tired and towards the end of her shift), hits him with a 9. The guy argues, PC comes in and everyone on the table support the guy, so the PC lets him stand. He comes back to me and asks whether I want the 9 to go on top of my 10. I hesitated for a second and thought about how many worse and better cards I could have gotten and decided to take the 9. PC also let me double my bet.
The dealer turns the bottom card, a 10, and hits with another 10 for a bust. My rationale for taking the 9 was if I took another card, there was 5/13 that would make me better off, and 7/13 that would make me worse. Since I would be doubling I would only be taking one card. So, to me 9 seemed to be a better than average card in that position and I took it. But, I’m open to see your opinions/comments on my rationale and whether it was the right thing to do.
In another instance with the same dealer, dealer is showing 10, and passes one guy who has a 15. The guy just before me stands on his 20, and I take a hit on my 10, only to get a crappy 5. So, the guy with the 15 argues that he motioned to hit, the dealer says she didn’t see, and honestly, I haven’t either. But I backed the guy with the hopes of getting rid of the god-damned 5. PC comes in and tells the guy that he would’ve accepted his case if it happened before he saw the 5. He offers him to take his bet back, so the guy takes his bet back. PC then comes to me and offers to burn the 5 if I’d like. Without hesitation, I wholeheartedly agree and get a 7 (grrrrr). Just like ihate17, I also hate 17, especially against a 10. Dealer pulls a 10 underneath and I lose. But, I think in this case I did the right thing to burn the 5, or did I?
The dealer turns the bottom card, a 10, and hits with another 10 for a bust. My rationale for taking the 9 was if I took another card, there was 5/13 that would make me better off, and 7/13 that would make me worse. Since I would be doubling I would only be taking one card. So, to me 9 seemed to be a better than average card in that position and I took it. But, I’m open to see your opinions/comments on my rationale and whether it was the right thing to do.
In another instance with the same dealer, dealer is showing 10, and passes one guy who has a 15. The guy just before me stands on his 20, and I take a hit on my 10, only to get a crappy 5. So, the guy with the 15 argues that he motioned to hit, the dealer says she didn’t see, and honestly, I haven’t either. But I backed the guy with the hopes of getting rid of the god-damned 5. PC comes in and tells the guy that he would’ve accepted his case if it happened before he saw the 5. He offers him to take his bet back, so the guy takes his bet back. PC then comes to me and offers to burn the 5 if I’d like. Without hesitation, I wholeheartedly agree and get a 7 (grrrrr). Just like ihate17, I also hate 17, especially against a 10. Dealer pulls a 10 underneath and I lose. But, I think in this case I did the right thing to burn the 5, or did I?