Amigo Invisible
New Member
I have recently began the practice of counting cards. I find that a few more weeks of practice and I will be ready for the casinos.
However, there is one problem. The nearest casino has some pretty weird rules. From my reading, I gather that these rules are not good for the player and should be avoided.
Here are those rules:
1 and 2 deck tables: Blackjack pays 6:5; may only double-down on 9, 10, or 11. May not double down after a split. These rules seem to be the casino seeking to compensate for the advantage the player may be getting my counting with the low number of decks.
6 deck tables: Typical Las Vegas rules. Blackjack plays 3:2, may double down on any cards, may double after splits.
My question at this point is what game should I play?
I believe that even thought it would be more difficult, the rules in the 6 deck tables make them a better choice than the 1 or 2 tables. I believe that the advantage I may get at a 6 deck table will often be greater than at a 1 or 2 deck table. That is, even though I may reach a +10 count in a 1 or 2 deck table, I will not be able to take full advantage of the high count, because of the many restrictions. Also, many people overlook this, but when Blackjack pays only 6:5, the player is really taking a bad hit when it comes to calculating his advantage.
So what do you guys think? Stick to the 6 deck shoe, even though it is 6 decks I'll be dealing with, but with good rules?
Or, also visit the 1 and 2 deck tables, with bad rules? Or, should I stay away from those 1 and 2 deck tables all together?
Paranthetically speaking, I read a book on blackjack (although the title/author escape me right now) that seemed to really abhor the 6:5 payout. The author strongly suggested to boycot these tables, going so far as to tell friends and family NOT to play at any table paying at 6:5.
Was he exaggerating or have you guys run into similar advice?
However, there is one problem. The nearest casino has some pretty weird rules. From my reading, I gather that these rules are not good for the player and should be avoided.
Here are those rules:
1 and 2 deck tables: Blackjack pays 6:5; may only double-down on 9, 10, or 11. May not double down after a split. These rules seem to be the casino seeking to compensate for the advantage the player may be getting my counting with the low number of decks.
6 deck tables: Typical Las Vegas rules. Blackjack plays 3:2, may double down on any cards, may double after splits.
My question at this point is what game should I play?
I believe that even thought it would be more difficult, the rules in the 6 deck tables make them a better choice than the 1 or 2 tables. I believe that the advantage I may get at a 6 deck table will often be greater than at a 1 or 2 deck table. That is, even though I may reach a +10 count in a 1 or 2 deck table, I will not be able to take full advantage of the high count, because of the many restrictions. Also, many people overlook this, but when Blackjack pays only 6:5, the player is really taking a bad hit when it comes to calculating his advantage.
So what do you guys think? Stick to the 6 deck shoe, even though it is 6 decks I'll be dealing with, but with good rules?
Or, also visit the 1 and 2 deck tables, with bad rules? Or, should I stay away from those 1 and 2 deck tables all together?
Paranthetically speaking, I read a book on blackjack (although the title/author escape me right now) that seemed to really abhor the 6:5 payout. The author strongly suggested to boycot these tables, going so far as to tell friends and family NOT to play at any table paying at 6:5.
Was he exaggerating or have you guys run into similar advice?