Basically, you are correct. But there IS some disagreement in the mathematical community over a slight technicality:
According to Peter Griffin; Advantage = (wins - losses) / (wins + losses).
According to WizardofOdds; Advantage = (wins - losses) / (wins + losses + ties).
The problem with Griffin is that, in a game with pushes or ties; your expectation will always be somewhat less than your advantage. With a 1% advantage, after $10,000 in total bets you can expect to be LESS than $100 ahead, because of pushes.
If you go by the Wizards' definition, then your expectation WILL be $100 after $10K is bet, but the problem with this definition is that it breaks down when trying to determine your bet size for a given advantage.
Personally, I'm going with Griffin. I like the idea of always knowing the optimal bet size for every situation.