adt_33
Active Member
I've been to the casino three times so far, all in all winning $325 (profit), which is a lot in my book (I have a small book).
With all the nay-sayers and odds-preachers here (it's a love/hate relationship to us novices), I suppose you could tell me if I am bound to lose on my next trip. Once the cards are shuffled, I assume that everything is returned to "normal" casino odds, regardless if it's today or next week or a few minutes from now.
The almighty phrase "in the long run" rings in my head as true because I believe math to be reliable, but then again I clearly don't understand odds-math well enough.
So let's get to the question: Since my normal strategy is to bail when I get a modest profit, is this skewing the normal "in the long run" BS odds (ie "playing BS just means you'll lose less in the long run")? When I think of BJ-odds, I think fluctuation/variance, therefore I bail when the fluctuation is good for me. So are the odds currently as constant as ever or will I lose next time? Or is the "next time I'll surely lose" mentality a sign of the gambler's fallacy?
With all the nay-sayers and odds-preachers here (it's a love/hate relationship to us novices), I suppose you could tell me if I am bound to lose on my next trip. Once the cards are shuffled, I assume that everything is returned to "normal" casino odds, regardless if it's today or next week or a few minutes from now.
The almighty phrase "in the long run" rings in my head as true because I believe math to be reliable, but then again I clearly don't understand odds-math well enough.
So let's get to the question: Since my normal strategy is to bail when I get a modest profit, is this skewing the normal "in the long run" BS odds (ie "playing BS just means you'll lose less in the long run")? When I think of BJ-odds, I think fluctuation/variance, therefore I bail when the fluctuation is good for me. So are the odds currently as constant as ever or will I lose next time? Or is the "next time I'll surely lose" mentality a sign of the gambler's fallacy?