10Splitter
New Member
In the following scenario:
Most of the table is dealt 17s and 18s which they stand on.
The dealer has an "8" upcard.
The dealer then flips over their hole card, which is a 10.
The dealer then hits his 18 with a 4.
The pit was then called over to evaluate the situation. The pit person took the 4 and discarded it. Told the dealer to take everybody's chips who had under an 18.
I argued (although breifly) that the dealer busted her hand, and that we should all get paid. Furthermore, I pointed out that if I "accidentally" busted my hand with such a hit, that I would have to give up my chips. The pit decided to ignore my argument.
This was in a Mississippi casino.
I am wondering if there is any kind of rule or regulation dictacting the appropriate action for the casino in this situation.
Also, does anybody have a suggestion for a better argument that I could have used with the pit.
Thanks in advance,
10Splitter
Most of the table is dealt 17s and 18s which they stand on.
The dealer has an "8" upcard.
The dealer then flips over their hole card, which is a 10.
The dealer then hits his 18 with a 4.
The pit was then called over to evaluate the situation. The pit person took the 4 and discarded it. Told the dealer to take everybody's chips who had under an 18.
I argued (although breifly) that the dealer busted her hand, and that we should all get paid. Furthermore, I pointed out that if I "accidentally" busted my hand with such a hit, that I would have to give up my chips. The pit decided to ignore my argument.
This was in a Mississippi casino.
I am wondering if there is any kind of rule or regulation dictacting the appropriate action for the casino in this situation.
Also, does anybody have a suggestion for a better argument that I could have used with the pit.
Thanks in advance,
10Splitter