asiafever said:
They are here to make money and they try to spread things like that to try to reduce the amount of card counters, if they make everyone think that it's illegal and like stealing, then fewer people will actually give it a try and they will have better explanations for barring players.
I've always found it interesting that card-counting in NJ is recognized as a legitimate way to play but in Nevada it's illegal. I think. Perhaps not illegal but they have the right to bar u for it. Is that right?
So NJ recognizes it's a game of skill and Nevada says u just have to be lucky.
I think way back when, like 1962 when a high-roller was $25 and I think basically all games were single deck dealt to the end, Beat the Dealer came out and all the casinos panicked thinking card-counters would win millions from them. They shut down BJ tables I think and only eventually figured out husbands were no longer bringing their wives to Vegas and most peope can't count to 2 anyway. Especially Thorpe's original system. When business fell off they brought it back. And then the war began - more decks, worse rules, less penetration, no touching the cards, ASM's, CSM's, no mid-shoe entry, face-recognition software, mirrors to check card, MindPlay, radio frequency chips in chips, etc.
I wonder when Nevada ruled suspected card-counters could be barred? Did the courts do it or the Gaming Commission? What exactly was their logic anyway?
I bet Vegas would rid themselves of every BJ game if they could but realize accepting smaller gains is more than offset by husbands bringing wives, hotel rooms, food etc. (don't mean to sound too sexist here lol.)
Hell, forget about card-counters being illegal or cheating, our own Neo-Nazi, bible-thumping, hypocritical gov't says it's illegal to just access the internet and play a $1 hand.