Wonging in questions?

I have been for a while not really wanting to wong in. To make up for it should I flat bet say $10 while I am waiting for a count to get rich, then ramp up to say $80 when it does get 10 rich. Would that be a good cover for double deck. Actually being a wong player without being a wong player. Or would single deck playing single deck in the south using an ace five side count while betting when I have any advantage $150. Normal rules. You know the procedure.

Really been wanting too switch things up lately and give the brain a rest. Which do you recommend?

Ace five side count Flat betting $25 until I have the advantage then springing up to $150. Or the first strategy?

Bankroll would be 9k
 
Last edited:

aslan

Well-Known Member
Where I have played double deck, I felt it difficult to remain undetected with as small a betting spread as 5X for any length of time. Maybe just my paranoia, but double deck seems difficult to camo, and at jumps from 1 to 8 a dead giveaway. With 1 to 8, I would hope for very poor surveillance, or a quick hit and run. I like this subject, because I don't have near as much experience with double deck as with shoe games. I hope a few experts will weigh in.
 

Sucker

Well-Known Member
Betting small when the house has the advantage, and then raising your bet when the edge goes in YOUR favor? What a novel concept!

But wait - we need a NAME for this strategy. I've got an idea! Let's call it ---
Card counting!
 
Sucker said:
Betting small when the house has the advantage, and then raising your bet when the edge goes in YOUR favor? What a novel concept!

But wait - we need a NAME for this strategy. I've got an idea! Let's call it ---
Card counting!
I am betting my max bet when I have the advantage. All advantage. I was wondering how much more of an advantage I would have per hour.
 

aslan

Well-Known Member
Sucker said:
Betting small when the house has the advantage, and then raising your bet when the edge goes in YOUR favor? What a novel concept!

But wait - we need a NAME for this strategy. I've got an idea! Let's call it ---
Card counting!
Is that fair?
 
aslan said:
Where I have played double deck, I felt it difficult to remain undetected with as small a betting spread as 5X for any length of time. Maybe just my paranoia, but double deck seems difficult to camo, and at jumps from 1 to 8 a dead giveaway. With 1 to 8, I would hope for very poor surveillance, or a quick hit and run. I like this subject, because I don't have near as much experience with double deck as with shoe games. I hope a few experts will weigh in.

Casinos in my town put up with me I guess because I could be up as much as 10k in one casino leave and lose 7k or more at another that I just won 2k from and still walk home with profit. And me playing 5+ times a month those losses and wins are spread out. I love advertising losses like that. Complain to the casino host, ohh you will be losing money...
 
Top