Hier finden Sie alle Kommentare, die auf der Website gepostet wurden, wobei die neuesten Diskussionen zuerst aufgeführt sind.
Wenn Sie sich an einer dieser Diskussionen beteiligen möchten, können Sie auf der Artikelseite antworten.
Vielen Dank für diesen Beitrag! Wenn das Haus eine Variante des Peek/No Peek verwendet, welche Strategie sollte ich dann anwenden? Die Variante besteht darin, dass das Haus, wenn es eine 10 zieht, keinen Peek macht, aber die Verdopplungen der Spieler ZURÜCKZAHLT, wenn das Haus einen Blackjack zieht. Wenn ich also eine 11 hätte, würde ich verdoppeln, aber gibt es noch andere Überlegungen?
Wenn sie Ihnen Ihre Verdoppelungen und Splits zurückzahlen, wenn sie einen Blackjack ziehen, verwenden Sie die Standard-Grundstrategie und Abweichungen, wie z.B. Verdoppeln von 11 gegen 10, Splitten von AA gegen A, Splitten von 8 gegen 10 und A und Verdoppeln von 11 gegen A bei einer echten 1+ und Verdoppeln von 10 gegen eine 10 und A bei einer echten 4+
I always wanted to ask this question. I have been playing at home with a 2 deck shoe. I have been playing for several years at home. I use a negative betting strategy. I play on a 100 table with 10k max stand on soft 17. I bet 100 100 300 600. After I lose 4 hands in a row I bet 100 100 1k 2k when I win either the 1k or 2k I go back and bet my original strategy of 100 100 300 600 until I lose and start it all over again. I used to start with 10k then switched to 7k start because I noticed starting with 10k did get me more wins in the long run. After 2 years I’m up at home 1 million bucks of fake money. I started with 50k and never went broke. I never lost more than 5 times in a row making the lose 35k. How was I able to do this and why won’t it work at the casino. I realize I’m playing at a table with just me. What are the odds of replicating this at the casino ?
Because the expected value of the money you have at the end is higher if you don’t. Now if you were playing competently i.e. counting cards and upgrading “basic strategy” to “advanced strategy”, there are times when you would do this. Namely if the truecount is more than 2, double an 8 against a 6, and if truecount exceeds 4, double an 8 against a 5. And if truecount passes 6 double 8 against a 4. But basic strategy says to do none of these things because basic strategy is the set of decisions you should make when count is 0 which is what it is on average if you are not counting cards.
The chance you loose 6 in a row is 2.1%. The article then states this will occur 1/47 times. The 1 occurrence is a loss of 6 hands, meaning the other 46 times 6 hands were also played and you won at least 1 time those 6 hands. Meaning a total of 282 total hands of blackjack were played here and six losses in a row occurred 1 time. Giving you the odds 1/47. Now if you use a modified martingale and cap your self at 6 losses in a row with an original bet of 10 your 6th bet will be 320. Your min bank roll would have to be 710. Based on these odds you plan on loosing 710 dollars per ever 282 hands of blackjack you play. However In that 282 you will also win a lot. The min amount of times you can win in 282 is 46. 46×10=$410 $410-710=Net of -300 dollars. However the theoretical amount of times you win in 282 hands based off having 43.3% chance of winning each hand is $1,221. Net profit of 1,221-710= $511. In theory you should alway net more money in 282 hands even when you loose 6 in a row one time.
leave the hand up in the background when you show the stats at the end, please. especially in quick mode, the cards disappear too quickly to absorb what happened! otherwise, great job. love the strategy coach!
Der durchschnittliche Spieler ist völlig ahnungslos, was die Regeln, die Chancen und die Strategie angeht. Das hat sich bereits auf den Strip übertragen.
If you’re playing by blackjack rules, you’re going to eventually lose. You’re winnings are the result of luck, not this strategy. This is the best trainer going for sure, but you’re eventually going to lose if you play by these strategies. If you could win simply playing these odds, the casinos would change the rules.
Sag mir bitte, wie viele Felder man beim Blackjack setzen sollte?
Kann man davon leben, wenn man perfekt BJ spielt?
Ja, natürlich.
Best trainer going.If you want to learn how to play the right way this is it.Thank you so much.
Wann verdoppeln Sie nach dem Split auch?
Nach dem Aufteilen würden Sie die beiden getrennten Karten als neues Blatt behandeln.
Vielen Dank für diesen Beitrag! Wenn das Haus eine Variante des Peek/No Peek verwendet, welche Strategie sollte ich dann anwenden? Die Variante besteht darin, dass das Haus, wenn es eine 10 zieht, keinen Peek macht, aber die Verdopplungen der Spieler ZURÜCKZAHLT, wenn das Haus einen Blackjack zieht. Wenn ich also eine 11 hätte, würde ich verdoppeln, aber gibt es noch andere Überlegungen?
Wenn sie Ihnen Ihre Verdoppelungen und Splits zurückzahlen, wenn sie einen Blackjack ziehen, verwenden Sie die Standard-Grundstrategie und Abweichungen, wie z.B. Verdoppeln von 11 gegen 10, Splitten von AA gegen A, Splitten von 8 gegen 10 und A und Verdoppeln von 11 gegen A bei einer echten 1+ und Verdoppeln von 10 gegen eine 10 und A bei einer echten 4+
I always wanted to ask this question. I have been playing at home with a 2 deck shoe. I have been playing for several years at home. I use a negative betting strategy. I play on a 100 table with 10k max stand on soft 17. I bet 100 100 300 600. After I lose 4 hands in a row I bet 100 100 1k 2k when I win either the 1k or 2k I go back and bet my original strategy of 100 100 300 600 until I lose and start it all over again. I used to start with 10k then switched to 7k start because I noticed starting with 10k did get me more wins in the long run. After 2 years I’m up at home 1 million bucks of fake money. I started with 50k and never went broke. I never lost more than 5 times in a row making the lose 35k. How was I able to do this and why won’t it work at the casino. I realize I’m playing at a table with just me. What are the odds of replicating this at the casino ?
why not double down with a hard 8 against a 5 or 6?
Because the expected value of the money you have at the end is higher if you don’t. Now if you were playing competently i.e. counting cards and upgrading “basic strategy” to “advanced strategy”, there are times when you would do this. Namely if the truecount is more than 2, double an 8 against a 6, and if truecount exceeds 4, double an 8 against a 5. And if truecount passes 6 double 8 against a 4. But basic strategy says to do none of these things because basic strategy is the set of decisions you should make when count is 0 which is what it is on average if you are not counting cards.
The chance you loose 6 in a row is 2.1%. The article then states this will occur 1/47 times. The 1 occurrence is a loss of 6 hands, meaning the other 46 times 6 hands were also played and you won at least 1 time those 6 hands. Meaning a total of 282 total hands of blackjack were played here and six losses in a row occurred 1 time. Giving you the odds 1/47. Now if you use a modified martingale and cap your self at 6 losses in a row with an original bet of 10 your 6th bet will be 320. Your min bank roll would have to be 710. Based on these odds you plan on loosing 710 dollars per ever 282 hands of blackjack you play. However In that 282 you will also win a lot. The min amount of times you can win in 282 is 46. 46×10=$410 $410-710=Net of -300 dollars. However the theoretical amount of times you win in 282 hands based off having 43.3% chance of winning each hand is $1,221. Net profit of 1,221-710= $511. In theory you should alway net more money in 282 hands even when you loose 6 in a row one time.
leave the hand up in the background when you show the stats at the end, please. especially in quick mode, the cards disappear too quickly to absorb what happened! otherwise, great job. love the strategy coach!
Der durchschnittliche Spieler ist völlig ahnungslos, was die Regeln, die Chancen und die Strategie angeht. Das hat sich bereits auf den Strip übertragen.
If you’re playing by blackjack rules, you’re going to eventually lose. You’re winnings are the result of luck, not this strategy. This is the best trainer going for sure, but you’re eventually going to lose if you play by these strategies. If you could win simply playing these odds, the casinos would change the rules.
Sie irren sich. Bei einer weichen 15 gegen 3 triffst du. Sie denken an eine harte 15.
Switch to a new online provider… 😂 Lol
In den Ruhestand gehen
learn a counting system
Steht derzeit in Calgary wegen Mordes vor Gericht.