Aquí están todos los comentarios publicados en el sitio, con los debates más recientes en primer lugar.
Para participar en cualquiera de estos debates, puede responder en la página del artículo.
ken la regla general de que tu br total debe ser min 100 veces tu apuesta max y el br de viaje debe ser 20 veces tu apuesta max te parece bien?
y una pregunta crusial !!!!! si mi br TOTAL se reduce a 50% por la mala varianza ¿debo redimensionar mis apuestas o seguir como si aún tuviera todo el dinero?
Lo curioso es que la mayoría de los crupieres de blackjack creen firmemente en la mentalidad de tomar la carta de bust. Incluso después de varias décadas trabajando en el sector, juran por ello y citan su amplia experiencia como prueba. Intenté explicárselo a un crupier y me respondió: "Bueno, si todo el mundo lo dice, debe de haber algo de cierto". Por supuesto, no son más que víctimas de su propio sesgo conformista. Pero es la ilusión de control sobre el resultado lo que hace que la mayoría de los jugadores vuelvan. La mente humana trata de ver un patrón y replicarlo para conseguir ese subidón de dopamina una vez más. El juego se reduce a las matemáticas, las probabilidades y la estrategia básica perfecta para minimizar las pérdidas a largo plazo (porque en general se pierde, no hay escapatoria). Jugar con ventaja es otra cosa, y depende mucho de la situación. Pero me sorprende cómo la gente sigue negándose a creer y defender apasionadamente esta filosofía de que otros jugadores afectan al resultado de la mano. Los jugadores de límites altos que regularmente están poniendo grandes sumas de dinero también son firmes creyentes en esto. Es sólo un ejemplo interesante de cómo está cableada la mente humana, supongo.
Tengo curiosidad por el tipo supersticioso que tiene una gran apuesta en la mesa con un 6 del crupier. Estoy en la 3ª base con mi ficha $5 delante de mí. Si tengo un 14 y acierto, ¿estoy jodiendo la mesa al coger la carta de bust del crupier? Pero, ¿y si tengo un 11? ¿Mi deseo de doblar y mejorar mi mano no va a perjudicar igualmente a la mesa? ¿De alguna manera, el hecho de jugar o no jugar según las reglas hace que esté "bien" aceptar la carta de bust del crupier? Nunca he entendido esa lógica.
Ganancia esperada / Desviación estándar. Supuestos: $12 apuesta media, 50 manos por hora, 1,25% ventaja media, utilizando ser $5 a $60.
En estas condiciones podría hacer un viaje para jugar 90 horas con sólo 1.175 dólares. En la peor de las hipótesis perdería sólo 1.175, con buenas posibilidades de recuperarlos. ¿Es así?
Reglas del casino:
8 cubiertas, H17 , DAS, Late Surrender , Peek , 70 % penetración.
I have basic strategy down ok. couple quick questions – Is it always best to play one spot? Do i always hit my 12 against the dealers 2 up-card and the dealers 3 up-card? Do i hit my soft 17 all the time? When do I hit soft 18? When do I double my soft 17 against dealer –
I too find the white border glaring and gives me a headache. Needs to be toned down or different color softer on the eyes. Your trainer is the best out there that I have been using these past 30 years. I don’t count cards with these 6 deck shoes but have your charts memorized that help with the odds. It amazes me to see soo many players play by the seat of their pants having not a clue what they are doing.
Palace Station has many 6-5 tables now and the 3:2 tables are sometimes full. So I played their 6:5 game for the first time with the tie side bet (half of main bet, pays 10:1 on push). Unless my math is horrible, one should actually double on blackjack for some dealer up cards (if not all?). So using your math, with a dealer up card of 5, the $50 pay out on a tie 7% of the time would add $3.50 to the $6.82. If you take the 6:5 blackjack you only get $7 because you lose the tie side bet ($12-$5). Then the question becomes, Bet $15 to win $7 or double down to bet $25 to win $10.32 with a 5 up card? How does it work out for the other up cards? The tie side bet actually lowers the house edge on a regular 3:2 game but obviously you don’t double blackjack on 3:2 even with the side bet. But I’m curious if the tie side bet substantially lowers the house edge on a 6:5 game if you double some blackjacks?
hi i am A new player trying to make IT as A career. my base is located in macau & korea. i have A Q for you. does peek / none peek makes any difference? i understand that macau & korea is playing different style korea allow dealers to peek
Just to update the thread. Golden Nugget in the Rush Lounge had several $15 minimum 3:2 blackjack tables. Unfortunately almost every other blackjack game I have seen in Vegas is 6:5 🙁
Hola ken estoy jugando en un casino donde la regla es:
6 barajas, h17, doble dos cartas cualesquiera, doble después de dividir, se permite rendirse.
Y: el casino tiene 2 comodines dentro de las 6 barajas, y si en tu mano, tienes un comodín, ganas inmediatamente, y se acaba la mano.
Creo que con esto tengo una gran ventaja a mi favor, ¿no crees?
So I have a question about betting. I am still very new to blackjack in general, but I’m interested in using the methods taught through this course to make some winnings. I’ve been watching videos and one I can recall from Howcast, explains different methods of betting. One method used was progressive, where you’d bet $100 and win, then next you bet $200, then $300, and so on. You lose a bet and as long as you have caught a pretty good winning streak, you still have some winnings. Just everytime you loser you go back to your minimum bet. I’ve been practicing that method myself at home a Little more conservatively. I’ll bet $10, then $15, then $20, then $30. I never double my bet but I increase it by about 50-75% roughly until I lose then drop back to $10. I’ll keep doing this with no maximum, even if I get to betting $1000’s at a time (almost never get that far) but is that still a red flag to casinos? It’s not like I’m going from a $10 bet to $500, I just gradually increase it as I’m riding a winning streak. And when my streak ends and I lose a “big” bet, I still come out ahead. Let me know if this is a good or bad idea to do in real casinos and why. Thank you.
If you play at a hand shuffled table the shuffle is not random! It is repetitive where card clumps occur. This is documented in studies by “first base blackjack.”
It occurs in two deck games and up. I have played games in Vegas when the dealer,s tell card or up card is 10 card 70 percent of a shoe. Don’t wait to be asked to leave just leave or your money will. The player at third base better play a strategy to win his hand. Third base is not there to save the table. Stastically, no one impacts the next cards except the schuffler. Casinos have the edge and continue to do so thru schuffle techniques and they are reliant on the player who refuses to leave. Remember, the dealer bust but still wins when the player bust because he takes your money and cards first. The dealer bust 28 percent of the time. Play in sessions of one hour or less. Less if you lose four hands in a row. Every dealer schuffles and deals per management guidelines. Go downtown and get away from the strip as it is easier to bump into a good game if you don’t recognize it on the strip. Dealers cheat players by not paying a player the correct amount. I had a dealer paid me $30 on a $10 bet with the 25 under the 5. Why, I have no clue! Ain’t it fascinating. Playing blackjack involves skills beyond card counting and basic strategy! Money management and being a keen observer is essential. Be likable and courteous, it may pay off, who knows. Good luck, and remember it always runs out but you can leave before it does. Time to leave!
ken la regla general de que tu br total debe ser min 100 veces tu apuesta max y el br de viaje debe ser 20 veces tu apuesta max te parece bien?
y una pregunta crusial !!!!! si mi br TOTAL se reduce a 50% por la mala varianza ¿debo redimensionar mis apuestas o seguir como si aún tuviera todo el dinero?
¿Alguien conoce a Kevin Barton?
Lo curioso es que la mayoría de los crupieres de blackjack creen firmemente en la mentalidad de tomar la carta de bust. Incluso después de varias décadas trabajando en el sector, juran por ello y citan su amplia experiencia como prueba. Intenté explicárselo a un crupier y me respondió: "Bueno, si todo el mundo lo dice, debe de haber algo de cierto". Por supuesto, no son más que víctimas de su propio sesgo conformista. Pero es la ilusión de control sobre el resultado lo que hace que la mayoría de los jugadores vuelvan. La mente humana trata de ver un patrón y replicarlo para conseguir ese subidón de dopamina una vez más. El juego se reduce a las matemáticas, las probabilidades y la estrategia básica perfecta para minimizar las pérdidas a largo plazo (porque en general se pierde, no hay escapatoria). Jugar con ventaja es otra cosa, y depende mucho de la situación. Pero me sorprende cómo la gente sigue negándose a creer y defender apasionadamente esta filosofía de que otros jugadores afectan al resultado de la mano. Los jugadores de límites altos que regularmente están poniendo grandes sumas de dinero también son firmes creyentes en esto. Es sólo un ejemplo interesante de cómo está cableada la mente humana, supongo.
Tengo curiosidad por el tipo supersticioso que tiene una gran apuesta en la mesa con un 6 del crupier. Estoy en la 3ª base con mi ficha $5 delante de mí. Si tengo un 14 y acierto, ¿estoy jodiendo la mesa al coger la carta de bust del crupier? Pero, ¿y si tengo un 11? ¿Mi deseo de doblar y mejorar mi mano no va a perjudicar igualmente a la mesa? ¿De alguna manera, el hecho de jugar o no jugar según las reglas hace que esté "bien" aceptar la carta de bust del crupier? Nunca he entendido esa lógica.
Ken,
Ganancia esperada / Desviación estándar. Supuestos: $12 apuesta media, 50 manos por hora, 1,25% ventaja media, utilizando ser $5 a $60.
En estas condiciones podría hacer un viaje para jugar 90 horas con sólo 1.175 dólares. En la peor de las hipótesis perdería sólo 1.175, con buenas posibilidades de recuperarlos. ¿Es así?
Reglas del casino:
8 cubiertas, H17 , DAS, Late Surrender , Peek , 70 % penetración.
En un blackjack básico, ¿el triple 7 suited se paga 3xs?
Does it matter what position you are, at the tournament table? I like seat one or seat seven?
I have basic strategy down ok. couple quick questions – Is it always best to play one spot? Do i always hit my 12 against the dealers 2 up-card and the dealers 3 up-card? Do i hit my soft 17 all the time? When do I hit soft 18? When do I double my soft 17 against dealer –
the trainer incorrectly tells me to surrender on 14 vs 10.
Torneios exclusivos diários de jogo em máquinas slots on-line! Não perca a sua chance! Adere!
I too find the white border glaring and gives me a headache. Needs to be toned down or different color softer on the eyes. Your trainer is the best out there that I have been using these past 30 years. I don’t count cards with these 6 deck shoes but have your charts memorized that help with the odds. It amazes me to see soo many players play by the seat of their pants having not a clue what they are doing.
Palace Station has many 6-5 tables now and the 3:2 tables are sometimes full. So I played their 6:5 game for the first time with the tie side bet (half of main bet, pays 10:1 on push). Unless my math is horrible, one should actually double on blackjack for some dealer up cards (if not all?). So using your math, with a dealer up card of 5, the $50 pay out on a tie 7% of the time would add $3.50 to the $6.82. If you take the 6:5 blackjack you only get $7 because you lose the tie side bet ($12-$5). Then the question becomes, Bet $15 to win $7 or double down to bet $25 to win $10.32 with a 5 up card? How does it work out for the other up cards? The tie side bet actually lowers the house edge on a regular 3:2 game but obviously you don’t double blackjack on 3:2 even with the side bet. But I’m curious if the tie side bet substantially lowers the house edge on a 6:5 game if you double some blackjacks?
hi i am A new player trying to make IT as A career. my base is located in macau & korea. i have A Q for you. does peek / none peek makes any difference? i understand that macau & korea is playing different style korea allow dealers to peek
how can i know korea & macau casino are using how many decks of cards?
Just to update the thread. Golden Nugget in the Rush Lounge had several $15 minimum 3:2 blackjack tables. Unfortunately almost every other blackjack game I have seen in Vegas is 6:5 🙁
Hola ken estoy jugando en un casino donde la regla es:
6 barajas, h17, doble dos cartas cualesquiera, doble después de dividir, se permite rendirse.
Y: el casino tiene 2 comodines dentro de las 6 barajas, y si en tu mano, tienes un comodín, ganas inmediatamente, y se acaba la mano.
Creo que con esto tengo una gran ventaja a mi favor, ¿no crees?
Enjoy reading and gaining more knowledge relative to
Playing a stronger game of blackjack.
Thank you for the good info.
So I have a question about betting. I am still very new to blackjack in general, but I’m interested in using the methods taught through this course to make some winnings. I’ve been watching videos and one I can recall from Howcast, explains different methods of betting. One method used was progressive, where you’d bet $100 and win, then next you bet $200, then $300, and so on. You lose a bet and as long as you have caught a pretty good winning streak, you still have some winnings. Just everytime you loser you go back to your minimum bet. I’ve been practicing that method myself at home a Little more conservatively. I’ll bet $10, then $15, then $20, then $30. I never double my bet but I increase it by about 50-75% roughly until I lose then drop back to $10. I’ll keep doing this with no maximum, even if I get to betting $1000’s at a time (almost never get that far) but is that still a red flag to casinos? It’s not like I’m going from a $10 bet to $500, I just gradually increase it as I’m riding a winning streak. And when my streak ends and I lose a “big” bet, I still come out ahead. Let me know if this is a good or bad idea to do in real casinos and why. Thank you.
If you play at a hand shuffled table the shuffle is not random! It is repetitive where card clumps occur. This is documented in studies by “first base blackjack.”
It occurs in two deck games and up. I have played games in Vegas when the dealer,s tell card or up card is 10 card 70 percent of a shoe. Don’t wait to be asked to leave just leave or your money will. The player at third base better play a strategy to win his hand. Third base is not there to save the table. Stastically, no one impacts the next cards except the schuffler. Casinos have the edge and continue to do so thru schuffle techniques and they are reliant on the player who refuses to leave. Remember, the dealer bust but still wins when the player bust because he takes your money and cards first. The dealer bust 28 percent of the time. Play in sessions of one hour or less. Less if you lose four hands in a row. Every dealer schuffles and deals per management guidelines. Go downtown and get away from the strip as it is easier to bump into a good game if you don’t recognize it on the strip. Dealers cheat players by not paying a player the correct amount. I had a dealer paid me $30 on a $10 bet with the 25 under the 5. Why, I have no clue! Ain’t it fascinating. Playing blackjack involves skills beyond card counting and basic strategy! Money management and being a keen observer is essential. Be likable and courteous, it may pay off, who knows. Good luck, and remember it always runs out but you can leave before it does. Time to leave!
Yes, you may use material herein, as long as blackjackinfo.com receives proper attribution.