JSTAT's response to his temporary ban here has been posted via his San Francisco Examiner site:
http://www.examiner.com/x-18051-San-Francisco-Blackjack-Examiner~y2009m8d22-Blackjackinfocom-silences-San-Francisco-Blackjack-Examiner
His month-long ban is set to expire here sometime in the next few days anyway, so I'm not sure why he delayed so long in posting this. I was expecting it immediately in late July!
As for the reason for his temporary ban here, it certainly wasn't to stifle an opposing point of view. JSTAT's posts of his system (whatever he's been willing to disclose at least) are intact here, for anyone to see.
What I DO object to is his habit of repeatedly posting the same misinformation over and over again, and ignoring any reasoned responses that dispute his claims. Yes, we all know that Hi-Lo overlooks some Ace-positive situations. Big deal. As pointed out in some of the responses here, JSTAT's system also erroneously identifies many deck compositions as favorable when they are not.
All counting systems involve approximations and errors. Hi-Lo has the benefit of ease of use and is strong enough for most purposes. In my personal play, I hate using side counts. That said, I don't use Hi-Lo either! I use the Halves count. Do I recommend Halves for new players? Nope. That honor goes to KO.
JSTAT's ban expires sometime in the next 6 days; I'm actually not sure when precisely. Upon his return, I have two requests for his continued participation here. 1) Don't repost the same articles over and over here, or mildly reworded versions of the same. 2) Be civil and nondisruptive on the boards and in the chat.
http://www.examiner.com/x-18051-San-Francisco-Blackjack-Examiner~y2009m8d22-Blackjackinfocom-silences-San-Francisco-Blackjack-Examiner
His month-long ban is set to expire here sometime in the next few days anyway, so I'm not sure why he delayed so long in posting this. I was expecting it immediately in late July!
As for the reason for his temporary ban here, it certainly wasn't to stifle an opposing point of view. JSTAT's posts of his system (whatever he's been willing to disclose at least) are intact here, for anyone to see.
What I DO object to is his habit of repeatedly posting the same misinformation over and over again, and ignoring any reasoned responses that dispute his claims. Yes, we all know that Hi-Lo overlooks some Ace-positive situations. Big deal. As pointed out in some of the responses here, JSTAT's system also erroneously identifies many deck compositions as favorable when they are not.
All counting systems involve approximations and errors. Hi-Lo has the benefit of ease of use and is strong enough for most purposes. In my personal play, I hate using side counts. That said, I don't use Hi-Lo either! I use the Halves count. Do I recommend Halves for new players? Nope. That honor goes to KO.
JSTAT's ban expires sometime in the next 6 days; I'm actually not sure when precisely. Upon his return, I have two requests for his continued participation here. 1) Don't repost the same articles over and over here, or mildly reworded versions of the same. 2) Be civil and nondisruptive on the boards and in the chat.