roger123doger
Member
playing at $100+/hand is it safe to spread 1-5 without getting any heat (even though it'll be a break even game)?
Depends on many factors. What do you mean 'breakeven'? zgroger123doger said:playing at $100+/hand is it safe to spread 1-5 without getting any heat (even though it'll be a break even game)?
There's a couple of things. First of all, it's not a break even game. In a good double decker, say 75% pen with DAS, you'll win a decent amount.roger123doger said:playing at $100+/hand is it safe to spread 1-5 without getting any heat (even though it'll be a break even game)?
Yeah but he was talking 6d not DD. 1-5 in black will win some $ but the variance will be huge and you'll need a 50k bank to even stay around 25% RoR with 75% pen. Find a 5/6 game and cut it to 17% RoR.moo321 said:There's a couple of things. First of all, it's not a break even game. In a good double decker, say 75% pen with DAS, you'll win a decent amount.
The main thing I would say though, is it's probably better to use a larger spread and lower unit. 1-8 in green will get a large amount of money, with less risk and less heat than 1-5 in black. Less variance, too.
Your RoR might be too high to reap enough comps to make up for the potential losses. If you don't mind me asking, what is your bankroll? That will help determine what your optimal bets should be. Balancing your comps with a smaller RoR seems like a better path to go down.roger123doger said:main reason for betting higher of a hand and spreading less would be to get comps at a casino where you want longevity at.
at $100+ a hand would a 1-5 spread be pretty reasonable or would even that be too much?
You mentioned wanting comps and longevity. At a place where you play regularly for bets in the $100-to-$500 range, I believe the number one requirement is that your player's card looks like a loser over time.roger123doger said:main reason for betting higher of a hand and spreading less would be to get comps at a casino where you want longevity at.
You can achieve that by intentionally playing $200 through VP or slots until your last penny is gone. If you get a free room for a week with that $200 it's worth it.Renzey said:You mentioned wanting comps and longevity. At a place where you play regularly for bets in the $100-to-$500 range, I believe the number one requirement is that your player's card looks like a loser over time.
I wasn't advocating losing, but rather concealing your not losing, or looking as if you've lost more -- whichever the case may be that day.alwayssplitaces said:You can achieve that by intentionally playing $200 through VP or slots until your last penny is gone. If you get a free room for a week with that $200 it's worth it.
According to CVCX. Using HI-LO with full indices. Spreading 5 to 1 in black with a bank of 10 grand. Even playing 6 deck,DAS,RSA,LS dealing 5 out of 6 decks your risk of ruin is over 60%. And the NO is over 28,000 hands. The hourly win rate is about 153 dollars. With the NO that high it will take a long time to get in the long run and see that win rate.roger123doger said:will be playing in vegas (ive heard they will back you off quicker than at a local casino)
bankroll will be 100 units
thanks for all your guys' help
Even your bankroll is 500 units, your chance of ruin is still too high. Normally the comfortable bankroll for any play is 2000 units. People having $20,000 bankroll should play $10 minimal table (6D deck).roger123doger said:will be playing in vegas (ive heard they will back you off quicker than at a local casino)
bankroll will be 100 units
thanks for all your guys' help
It will bring heat at all but a few places. You'll be bumping into the table limit at a lot of places.roger123doger said:thanks guys, i realized my mistake after I posted that...
is spreading 1-10 with a $50 base going to attract a ton of heat too?
on HL strip rules with lots and lots of cover:ultimate camo packageroger123doger said:playing at $100+/hand is it safe to spread 1-5 without getting any heat (even though it'll be a break even game)?