A winning streak.

Mimosine

Well-Known Member
Knox said:
I can't believe I actually typed "vis a vis"!

D@mn I must be getting old! Next thing you know I will even be talking like that...

:grin:
you can mix it up with a good "apropos" every now and then....
 

Mimosine

Well-Known Member
zengrifter said:
Just the opposite - play untill you have a serious loss and then go to casino because... YOU'RE DUE!

Also, when at home, change tables when losing - move the laptop to the kitchen table, then the coffee table, etc. zg
OH my god, HAHAHAHAHA!

Funniest Post of 2008!
 

Knox

Well-Known Member
ZG is a hoot. Which of you folks are CBJN Green Chip members? It would be worth it to join just for the CBJN reports, and meeting some of the characters on here would be priceless.
 

Kasi

Well-Known Member
Sonny said:
I agree. If the two hands are equal then the results will tend to average out. If the two hands are asymmetrical then the results will tend to cluster around the hand with the larger bet. The results will be skewed towards the larger bet so the variance will increase as the difference between the bets increases.-Sonny-
When you put it that way it makes complete sense lol.

Would it change, would you know, the stan dev # I'm used (1.349) to for 2 hands when bets are equal would you say or could I still use it?

Like I'd just normally for say $100 on each of 2 hands 100*sqrt of 2 * 1.349.
Could I go $150,etc and $50 etc and sum the 2 results basically doubling the the result of the same $200 bet if both bets were equal?

Just assuming BS here - forget about counting and it's stan dev lol.

No big deal - just wondering.
 
Top