This happens all the time.. people surrender soft hands against face card...21forme said:Was playing the other day and player at the table Surrendered a 4,2 v 9 :laugh:
That was me. But I had a very good reason to do so. And it had nothing to do with winning THAT hand.21forme said:Was playing the other day and player at the table Surrendered a 4,2 v 9 :laugh:
I didn't know you are an old, Asian woman :grin:Sucker said:That was me. But I had a very good reason to do so. And it had nothing to do with winning THAT hand.![]()
The BEST cover! :laugh:21forme said:I didn't know you are an old, Asian woman :grin:
Got that beat. A woman was playing 2 hands. Dealer has an Ace showing. Her first hand totals 13 so she surrenders. Her second hand totals 16 and she stands! WTF?! Later on she surrenders a 12 against a 3. Those were the only hands I saw her surrender all night.21forme said:Was playing the other day and player at the table Surrendered a 4,2 v 9 :laugh:
This would end up being used by, and singling out counters really quickly.alwayssplitaces said:In PA where surrender is the law, people either surrender too much or never surrender. They should also offer "casino surrender" in which you have the option to win a guaranteed 50% of your bet if you have a twenty or a guaranteed 75% of your bet if you have a 21. People would take that like they always take even money on blackjack vs dealer ace.
I would think counters would never use the option of casino surrender since the EV of a 20 is >50% for all upcards and the EV of a 21 is >75%. It would be used by ploppies who want a guaranteed win, since a lot of ploppies always take even money.Mewtwo said:This would end up being used by, and singling out counters really quickly.
The EV of a 20 is above 50%, yes. But what if the count's +10, and thus the dealer is more than 50% likely to have a 10 down under their 10 up?alwayssplitaces said:I would think counters would never use the option of casino surrender since the EV of a 20 is >50% for all upcards and the EV of a 21 is >75%. It would be used by ploppies who want a guaranteed win, since a lot of ploppies always take even money.
Assumed she peeked before (late surrender). If she has the 10 under you push your bet. If she hasn't the 10 she must have a lower card, and you are likely to win your hand.Mewtwo said:The EV of a 20 is above 50%, yes. But what if the count's +10, and thus the dealer is more than 50% likely to have a 10 down under their 10 up?
I play at a casino that has Casino Surrender. They call it "Automatic win," but it's the same thing. Surprisingly, hardly anyone ever takes it.alwayssplitaces said:In PA where surrender is the law, people either surrender too much or never surrender. They should also offer "casino surrender" in which you have the option to win a guaranteed 50% of your bet if you have a twenty or a guaranteed 75% of your bet if you have a 21. People would take that like they always take even money on blackjack vs dealer ace.
It is a play usable by a counter.SecurityRisk said:I play at a casino that has Casino Surrender. They call it "Automatic win," but it's the same thing. Surprisingly, hardly anyone ever takes it.
I'm not worried about losing the hand, but rather getting a win where I would have otherwise pushed.MangoJ said:Assumed she peeked before (late surrender). If she has the 10 under you push your bet. If she hasn't the 10 she must have a lower card, and you are likely to win your hand.
The only chance to lose your hand is a multicard 21, which is much more unlikely in a strong positive count.
Sorry, I missed that you were interested in Casino surrender. You are right, percentage holding a 10 must be above 50%. I'm not sure what the TC threshold is for that.Mewtwo said:I'm not worried about losing the hand, but rather getting a win where I would have otherwise pushed.
If the dealer has peeked for blackjack and does not have it witha 10 up, in very high counts, the probability that the dealer's hole card is also a 10 would be above 50%. In those cases, you are better off taking a half-win rather than pushing, no?
Casino would be lucky to get 40 hands an hour with those options. Last time I treied to play the double Attack game at the EC, we were getting less than thirty hands per hour with the incessant rules explanations and the committees voting on how to play almost every hand.1357111317 said:Casinos should give players as many possible decisions as they can. The more decisions, the more they can make the wrong play. Surrender, doubling, insurance, casino surrender, everything.