KewlJ
Well-Known Member
I don't think anyone expected YOU to pull any punches.21forme said:Since you brought it up, I'll say it and won't pull punches:
First my wording was not good at all. Instead of saying "Should (definitively) play rated", I should have said, red chip players are the only ones that should even consider playing rated.21forme said:I strongly disagree here. As comps are minimal for table games nowadays, especially for red chippers, why risk your name for a negligible return?
But even at that, you make a good point. Most casinos are just so tight now, offering nothing for red chip play and little for even higher limit table play, that it probably isn't worth it, unless you have an unusual circumstance.
Back in my red chip days, playing Atlantic City, the comps I got for my red chip table play were important to my situation. I was living on a shoe-string budget, trying to build my BR and the little bit of food comps meant I didn't have to spend actual money on food and got a little something to eat more nutritious than mac & cheese and PB & jelly sandwiches which were my food staples for a year or two.
As a matter of fact, I think you could take it a step further and recommend that newer players not even play red chip at all. Skip that level, even if it means waiting a year or two to build a bigger BR. In Today's world of BJ play and surveillance, database technology, who knows how long a player really has time-wise to play. With a finite number of years, why waste a couple years (as I did) playing red chip and burning out your face and name for peanuts.
Last edited: