ZenKinG
Well-Known Member
So it's pretty obvious Aria are using facial recognition, which isn't a surprise as they're the sharpest of all surveillance teams in Las Vegas, but I confirmed it 100% now. The joke is on them though because they're messing with the wrong person since I never give up at anything. They've already backed me off over 6 times after promising they would trespass me on the next visit. So much for these bluff trespasses that I've talked about on other forums. Note to Aria management and surveillance team, I will keep coming back, i got nothing better to do than to troll you and other casinos who back me off and I take great joy in doing so. I will come back 500 more times until you bluff trespass me. And guess what? I will come back again after that until we go to court. Please put handcuffs on me. But let's not digress any further.
So the point is this, I'm looking at 'blinding' the facial recognition software with an anti-facial recognition hat that has infrared LED lights attached to it. When Aria zoom in on me, they will get blinded by the infrared lights and cause a white halo around my face, thus not getting an image or read on me, meanwhile on the floor I will look completely normal to everyone. My only problem with this technique is the 'attention' this will draw to me and the casino thinking I'm up to something fishy, much worse than card counting, perhaps past posting or theft of some kind, which obviously i wont be and would never do something illegal and destroy my life for a few bucks. Last thing I need is the casino trying to use anything against me to 'legally' trespass me from the premises or worse have me arrested. I believe this would be legal to wear inside a casino and not fall under the 'device' statutes for cheating where you cannot use a 'device' to assist in your play. This is precisely why I'm wearing a 'hat' as opposed to sunglasses with LED lights attached to them. If I were to wear sunglasses they might think I'm marking cards with invisible ink or at least try to make that argument, etc. With a hat, they won't be able to tell me it's a device used to assist me in playing blackjack or at the very least have much less leeway to try and build up an argument that it falls under cheating.
Again, someone please tell me what you think about all of this. My only purpose for wearing this is to not get backed off within 15 minutes before placing a bet after returning from months of not visiting, so it's clear Aria is using facial recog. This also applies to any other casino and not just Aria and what you guys think about using this 'hat' at other places. I only stay at casinos for 30-45 min max, so I just need to be able to get in to backcount a couple of shoes and then get out. It's not like I'm going to be wearing this hat with a white glare around my face for hours sitting at a table. But then again, this is Aria we are talking about. Standing' behind a blackjack table at Aria is the equivalent of spreading 1x25-2x400 at any other joint. They love to catch backcounters. They also are completely droned out of their minds for having a dedicated department for game protection. They think they're so smart, but the owner's wallets is the one taking the hit wasting money on a needless department, all due to casino ignorance and paranoia about the games they offer, so the joke's ultimately on them.
So the point is this, I'm looking at 'blinding' the facial recognition software with an anti-facial recognition hat that has infrared LED lights attached to it. When Aria zoom in on me, they will get blinded by the infrared lights and cause a white halo around my face, thus not getting an image or read on me, meanwhile on the floor I will look completely normal to everyone. My only problem with this technique is the 'attention' this will draw to me and the casino thinking I'm up to something fishy, much worse than card counting, perhaps past posting or theft of some kind, which obviously i wont be and would never do something illegal and destroy my life for a few bucks. Last thing I need is the casino trying to use anything against me to 'legally' trespass me from the premises or worse have me arrested. I believe this would be legal to wear inside a casino and not fall under the 'device' statutes for cheating where you cannot use a 'device' to assist in your play. This is precisely why I'm wearing a 'hat' as opposed to sunglasses with LED lights attached to them. If I were to wear sunglasses they might think I'm marking cards with invisible ink or at least try to make that argument, etc. With a hat, they won't be able to tell me it's a device used to assist me in playing blackjack or at the very least have much less leeway to try and build up an argument that it falls under cheating.
Again, someone please tell me what you think about all of this. My only purpose for wearing this is to not get backed off within 15 minutes before placing a bet after returning from months of not visiting, so it's clear Aria is using facial recog. This also applies to any other casino and not just Aria and what you guys think about using this 'hat' at other places. I only stay at casinos for 30-45 min max, so I just need to be able to get in to backcount a couple of shoes and then get out. It's not like I'm going to be wearing this hat with a white glare around my face for hours sitting at a table. But then again, this is Aria we are talking about. Standing' behind a blackjack table at Aria is the equivalent of spreading 1x25-2x400 at any other joint. They love to catch backcounters. They also are completely droned out of their minds for having a dedicated department for game protection. They think they're so smart, but the owner's wallets is the one taking the hit wasting money on a needless department, all due to casino ignorance and paranoia about the games they offer, so the joke's ultimately on them.
Last edited:
