Sonny
Well-Known Member
Re: Eye For An Eye, Tooth For A Tooth
> I don't think any casino should have a right to take picture of a patron
> without their knowledge/consent and then make it available to the public or
> news media...
Here in Los Angeles you need to get a formal release form signed by the person AND the photographer/company just to be in the BACKGROUND of a movie. I think that casinos should follow the same procedure. "Excuse me, sir. Would you sign this photograph release form so that we can include you photo in the Griffin Book? Smile!"
> We don't get to take pictures of them and all the unethical crap they pull,
> let alone get it put into the news. ???
Hell, I can't even take a picture of MYSELF in their casinos! Nobody is allowed to photograph ANYTHING...except them. They can photograph whatever they want whenever they want. There must be some kind of law they're breaking!
-Sonny-
> I don't think any casino should have a right to take picture of a patron
> without their knowledge/consent and then make it available to the public or
> news media...
Here in Los Angeles you need to get a formal release form signed by the person AND the photographer/company just to be in the BACKGROUND of a movie. I think that casinos should follow the same procedure. "Excuse me, sir. Would you sign this photograph release form so that we can include you photo in the Griffin Book? Smile!"
> We don't get to take pictures of them and all the unethical crap they pull,
> let alone get it put into the news. ???
Hell, I can't even take a picture of MYSELF in their casinos! Nobody is allowed to photograph ANYTHING...except them. They can photograph whatever they want whenever they want. There must be some kind of law they're breaking!
-Sonny-