zengrifter
Banned
Something like a bad 8D. Monk? zgmoo321 said:Does anyone want to post some SCORE numbers, or are we trying to keep this a secret? If so, I'll shut up and we can kill the thread.
Something like a bad 8D. Monk? zgmoo321 said:Does anyone want to post some SCORE numbers, or are we trying to keep this a secret? If so, I'll shut up and we can kill the thread.
There's a thread on it. Too lazy to find it now, but it was started by anirishmannottoobright, maybe a year ago.moo321 said:Does anyone want to post some SCORE numbers, or are we trying to keep this a secret? If so, I'll shut up and we can kill the thread.
jopke said:I was thinking it would be kind of fun to try attacking a 6:5 game. I'd be playing a small unit and doing it more for the challenge than anything.
Any advice? I use TKO, which I know isn't ideal for single deck, but oh well...
Can a very aggressive spread beat it? Spreading from 1 to 2x40 would crush, right?
How much does the lower BJ payoff devalue aces? Sequencing is still worthwhile, right?
I play primarily shoe games and 2D where I can get good pen. I've only played single deck when a casino was running a deal where they payed 2-1 on naturals during certain time periods, which applied to the 6:5 games as well. (That was a ton of fun, I flat be 3x$100 and made a killing.)
There was some discussion about 6:5 on Green Chip a few months ago and Don S. said you don't have an advantage at 6:5 SD until TC +5, due to the reduced value of the ace.billionaireben said:a TC of +2 is a 0.25% advantage,
I have a local game that is 6:5 SD. Rules are H17, LS, RSA, DA2, DAS. Too bad they didn't make it S17.KingHenry said:i ran a quick 100 million sim using DAS S17, 50% pen and double any two, and it suggests ramping at TC +3 (not sure what the typical rules are though on 6:5 bj). on these rules the win rate is good, but the risk is really high putting the Score at 29.53 for a spread of 2x1 to 2x20. RoR for 200 unit bankroll is 16.8%.
if you post the exact rules i can prob get you a more accurate figure
I ever been to Hooters several months ago,they have bad SD rule and bad dealers and croweded.billionaireben said:Hooters DD games were the majority of my losses and I still made a profit at MGM playing only 6:5 games.
Let me explain this further.White Guy said:I have some advice:
Don't Do It.
Beautiful game???? I just posted about losing my 22 v 6 three splits and three double bets that I lost at a moderate bet :cry: :laugh:blackjacktilt said:Let me explain this further.
STAY AWAY FROM 6:5, THE MORE WHO PLAY IT, THE MORE IT STAYS AND RUINS THIS BEAUTIFUL GAME :whip:
Ok beautiful might not be the right word... But you get my point.
Sarcasm my friend :laugh: I hate blackjack:whip:Gamblor said:Beautiful game???? I just posted about losing my 22 v 6 three splits and three double bets that I lost at a moderate bet :cry: :laugh:
Why don't you attack european roulette and pai gow while you're at it. Show some balls and be a real man.jopke said:I was thinking it would be kind of fun to try attacking a 6:5 game. I'd be playing a small unit and doing it more for the challenge than anything.
Any advice? I use TKO, which I know isn't ideal for single deck, but oh well...
Can a very aggressive spread beat it? Spreading from 1 to 2x40 would crush, right?
How much does the lower BJ payoff devalue aces? Sequencing is still worthwhile, right?
I play primarily shoe games and 2D where I can get good pen. I've only played single deck when a casino was running a deal where they payed 2-1 on naturals during certain time periods, which applied to the 6:5 games as well. (That was a ton of fun, I flat be 3x$100 and made a killing.)
You are talking about HCing, right; you weren't actually counting at it?? We're all mature adults here, you can say HCing - or has this board grown so secretive you can't even say the H word anymore?creeping panther said:I gave in to playing 6.5 sd last night due to a special opportunity,,,1.33 HA but I won some good money on it.
Would I do it again,,maybe ,,if the special opportunity continues but it will never replace a 3.2 game.
CP
What does Don know? You would think he wrote a book or something. He should stick to spelling and grammar and leave blackjack to guys like Jerry Patterson.21forme said:There was some discussion about 6:5 on Green Chip a few months ago and Don S. said you don't have an advantage at 6:5 SD until TC +5, due to the reduced value of the ace.
I prefer Scoblete's expert advice :grin:b jay cobbson said:What does Don know? You would think he wrote a book or something. He should stick to spelling and grammar and leave blackjack to guys like Jerry Patterson.
Cobbson
what saith don is the value of each hi-lo tc point in this game, knoweth ye?21forme said:There was some discussion about 6:5 on Green Chip a few months ago and Don S. said you don't have an advantage at 6:5 SD until TC +5, due to the reduced value of the ace.
Might as go to ace neutral count or Zen (ace half the value) at 6:5 if you are going to beat your head against the wall. The ace has little extra value for betting and really messes up your PE for playing.Low Ball Cap Real Low LOW said:what saith don is the value of each hi-lo tc point in this game, knoweth ye?
sent with apologies.
Thanks, tthree -- it's good advice. The little shuffle that makes the 6:5 in question worth a go is sort of a pressing matter requiring immediate attention, and the casino is scary and immiserated, unlikely to give up enough queso to warrant this very old dog learning anything at all. But I would like to be able to know whether I got edge or not in all those true 5s and 6s and 7s I'm going deftly to craft in the joint. And hi-lo is all I got!tthree said:Might as go to ace neutral count or Zen (ace half the value) at 6:5 if you are going to beat your head against the wall. The ace has little extra value for betting and really messes up your PE for playing.