kewljason
Well-Known Member
I will start by offering you a belated welcome to the site and community. When you first popped up on the site 2 weeks ago, I like many members, was very skeptical of your claims, especially considering the timing of your arrival coincided with a huge sudden influx of new members and poster, which I am still unsure about. To be honest, like Mr Bo, am not completely convinced of your authenticity, but you have demonstrated a certain degree of knowledge in the field you speak of and frankly I have already benefited by some of your thoughts.
It also occurred to me that engaging in too much discussion with you, especially in detail as I tend to do, could have negative ramifications. From the resume you spoke of, you have bounced around all over the place on both sides of the 'fence'. Who knows when and where you could turn up next.
But I do have a couple topics that I would like to hear your thoughts on, if you would be so generous.
First, you mentioned the use of cover several times to throw surveillance off. A practice I don't engage in much, as I am of the belief that cover, eats up to much of an already thin advantage margin and quite frankly it's benefits are limited and short-lived. Basically I don't think it buys that much. I have adopted a style to try to fly under the radar, as you say, by employing 4 basic moves. 1.) Playing mostly unrated. 2.) Playing very short sessions, 30-40 minutes tops, but usually less due to wong out of negative counts style. 3.) Keeping max bets below $500 threshold. 4.) Always leaving at the shuffle after any shoe that had higher wagers, so there is little record of reducing wagers, only increasing. Can you tell me your opinion of such a strategy, and keep in mind I am concerned mostly with Las Vegas and the strip casinos that can handle a $400 range max bet with out even thinking twice or taking notice.
The second issue, is I would like to hear your opinion of, and any info that you could share about the OSN.
Thank you for your time and participation on the site.
It also occurred to me that engaging in too much discussion with you, especially in detail as I tend to do, could have negative ramifications. From the resume you spoke of, you have bounced around all over the place on both sides of the 'fence'. Who knows when and where you could turn up next.
But I do have a couple topics that I would like to hear your thoughts on, if you would be so generous.
First, you mentioned the use of cover several times to throw surveillance off. A practice I don't engage in much, as I am of the belief that cover, eats up to much of an already thin advantage margin and quite frankly it's benefits are limited and short-lived. Basically I don't think it buys that much. I have adopted a style to try to fly under the radar, as you say, by employing 4 basic moves. 1.) Playing mostly unrated. 2.) Playing very short sessions, 30-40 minutes tops, but usually less due to wong out of negative counts style. 3.) Keeping max bets below $500 threshold. 4.) Always leaving at the shuffle after any shoe that had higher wagers, so there is little record of reducing wagers, only increasing. Can you tell me your opinion of such a strategy, and keep in mind I am concerned mostly with Las Vegas and the strip casinos that can handle a $400 range max bet with out even thinking twice or taking notice.
The second issue, is I would like to hear your opinion of, and any info that you could share about the OSN.
Thank you for your time and participation on the site.
